

[video]https://youtu.be/swo9oFDW3u8[/video]
I can't believe that could have happened. But then again anything seems possible these days.Kristatos wrote:I do hope this story is nonsense: http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/skyfall ... r-the-film
When asked who was the first Bond villain he answered Cubby Broccoli. I think that says it all.Kristatos wrote:I can't imagine Connery giving them the time of day, to be honest.
carl stromberg wrote:I can't believe that could have happened. But then again anything seems possible these days.Kristatos wrote:I do hope this story is nonsense: http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/skyfall ... r-the-film
Connery refuses to promote James Bond box set for franchise's 50th Sir Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan have agreed to promote the release of a new Blu-ray DVD set, but Connery is refusing. He believes he was cheated out of millions by 007 movie executives, sources said.
Goldeneye wrote:carl stromberg wrote:I can't believe that could have happened. But then again anything seems possible these days.Kristatos wrote:I do hope this story is nonsense: http://www.denofgeek.com/movies/skyfall ... r-the-film![]()
![]()
![]()
Connery would not show up for the Academy Awards with the other Bonds. He refused Steven Spielberg and George Lucas requests who he likes, I can not imagine he actually showed up to help EON who he actively dislikes.
If this was a real plan for the story Roger Moore is falling over himself to be useful to EON, Moore and Brosnan were out selling the 007 Blu-ray box set, while Connery again refused. Two former 007 who could be used if the Skyfall plot was different as this story says.
Very hard time believing this one, sounds like the fan gossip in 2002 with Connery coming back for DAD.
Connery refuses to promote James Bond box set for franchise's 50th Sir Roger Moore and Pierce Brosnan have agreed to promote the release of a new Blu-ray DVD set, but Connery is refusing. He believes he was cheated out of millions by 007 movie executives, sources said.
Fair enough. Some of it I might justify however we never heard so much as a peep from Timothy, I believe he wanted to go on circumstances dictated other.Daltonite Toothpaste wrote:I'm not suggesting that Brosnan was holding EON hostage. What I am commenting on, is Brosnan's less than classy attitude over the years, and wondering how much they can turn a blind eye to. In 1986, when he lost the role, he went and did that "Take this job and shove it" interview. 3 years later, he decides that if he can't be a part of the official series, then he will make a rival Bond film with McClory of all people. When EON came knocking in 1994, Brosnan couldn't assume the position fast enough. And when his services are no longer required in 2005, he throws the mother of all tantrums, dropping that many f-bombs, even Dan Craig would get uncomfortable.
IF they gave Connery half the budget and a percentage of the proceeds I might credit it.English Agent wrote:This story about Connery and Skyfall............sounds like a load of bollocks (excuse my English!) to me!
I think Connery would rather of performed DIY embalming..........than return to a Bond film. I mean he's too old, he retired from films because he was fed up with the way the studios and producers worked...........and returning to Bond, would of probably opened up some old wounds!
Returning to Spectre.....i hope the new film is not like a Skyfall pt2.........as i like the films to each have their own distinct style and feel, as the original movies did!
Veronica wrote:You know what I just read? Someone commented how Craig said Spectre is 10 times better than Skyfall and how that's an "interesting comment" and then someone replied:"That means Spectre is barely an average film."