Blood was something the producers couldn't really show back in 1962, but in Dr. No we still manage to see Bond dirty, torn and slightly bloody. In FRWL the famous fight sequence is shot very realistically, and the tie-straightening part at the end of the fight is a natural, instinctive move by Connery, not to be drawn attention to, and nothing remotely like the contrived crap seen during the Brosnan era.Capt. Sir Dominic Flandry wrote:Well, you've just described Sean's Bond.winks, eyebrow raises, fights without a single hair out of place, gets beaten up with not a trace of blood on him, etc?
Yes, you are probably right, if that's what you define as Bondish!
In Connery's first 2 films he plays Bond serious, with very little in the way of humour (and only then added to stop 60's audiences being shocked with the rather violent action for the times).
Admittedly, by the time YOLT and DAF came around, they were more like the recent, OTT trashy Brosnan Bond's - and therefore the weakest films during the Connery era.