Sorry BJ, but ever since 2005 I have usually been right with these Craig predictions, and you have been wrong.bjmdds wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()

Sorry BJ, but ever since 2005 I have usually been right with these Craig predictions, and you have been wrong.bjmdds wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
Well, there wouldn't be any need for this site, obviously. I expect we'd all be on one or more of the other Bond sites.stockslivevan wrote:The good news is that as long as people like Daniel Craig as Bond and keep going to his Bond movies that means this site has a few years left.Imagine if Craig had only done CR, it flopped and everyone hated it like BJ predicted in 2006, where would this site be in 2012?
He was right this time.The Sweeney wrote:Sorry BJ, but ever since 2005 I have usually been right with these Craig predictions, and you have been wrong.bjmdds wrote:![]()
![]()
![]()
We'd still be going, only as DanielCraigWasNotBond.com.stockslivevan wrote:The good news is that as long as people like Daniel Craig as Bond and keep going to his Bond movies that means this site has a few years left.Imagine if Craig had only done CR, it flopped and everyone hated it like BJ predicted in 2006, where would this site be in 2012?
no........sorry 'Omega' 'iam a a BATTLEFIELD 3 man.Omega wrote:Anyone else going to be on Black Ops 2 this weekend?![]()
Not a surprise it was a federal holiday. Always a big boost but it wanders this and last it was attached to the weekend.English Agent wrote:SF now at over $100 mil in US after a large BO take on Monday!
I sold my BF3 to get COD BO2, Battlefield is fun but I didn't dig the online pay. Or the new ghost recon, for the new COD they changed some thing I not sure I like. I like being the first batch to play it long before there are nubetube generals lurking round every corner.English Agent wrote:no........sorry 'Omega' 'iam a a BATTLEFIELD 3 man.Omega wrote:Anyone else going to be on Black Ops 2 this weekend?![]()
Chief of Staff, 007's gone round the bend. Says someone's been trying to feed him a poisoned banana. Fellow's lost his nerve. Been in the hospital too long. Better call him home.
'BJ'.........question for you. As you wont see a Bond film in the cinema starring DC.......whats this review based on, is it just on what you know of the storyline. Just was wondering!bjmdds wrote:My review:This film can be summed up as the MISadventures of James BondThere is sterility of fun. MI6 is inept, Moneypenny is inept, M is inept, Bond has suddenly gone from a novice 00 to an over the hill drunk(who looks like George Steele), Q is inept, and Bardem's villain
is a boring Jame Gumb Silence Of The Lambs disgrace as well. THIS deserves Oscar talk? Why?
Waaaaaaaaaaaaay overdone Dench here. The acting was uneventful, the Bond girls were basically a non-entity, and this mundane and moronic plot had ZERO to do with Bond saving the world, instead, he had to save himself. Broccoli receiving praise for this calamity? I think not. Again, this has ZERO to do with a properly done Bond film. Pierce's GE with Bean's 006 outdid this crap any day of the week, and it was FUN
Might be doablekatied wrote:First of all, can we get that Austin Powers/Daniel Craig pic as an avatar? *please?*![]()
Second, BJ, I hated Bardem too. I didn't love the movie, but I didn't hate it either; but I'll only be seeing it once. Hopefully you didn't have to pay anything to get in.