I do not rate Brosnon

tiswas · Post by **tiswas** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 10:54 am

The reasons are that with him, he seems lightweight, too much of a male model and really up-himself. Who knows the DC film, the new one, might even be good and I hope the theme song will be a lot better than the CR one. So what if he is a blond, so was Roger Moore and he was good in LALD, MWTGG, TSWLM and FYEO.
I feel that Bond really is a 60's guy, not a millenium guy. And apparantly why is there no Bond Film about the terrorism in the Mid-East.
That maybe a worthy bond film for Daniel Craig to tackle.

Post by **Skywalker** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:26 pm

tiswas wrote:The reasons are that with him, he seems lightweight, too much of a male model and really up-himself. Who knows the DC film, the new one, might even be good and I hope the theme song will be a lot better than the CR one. So what if he is a blond, so was Roger Moore and he was good in LALD, MWTGG, TSWLM and FYEO.
I feel that Bond really is a 60's guy, not a millenium guy. And apparantly why is there no Bond Film about the terrorism in the Mid-East.
That maybe a worthy bond film for Daniel Craig to tackle.

Sir Rog's hair certainly got lighter as the years rolled on, but I wouldn't call it blond.

tiswas · Post by **tiswas** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 4:51 pm

Roger Moore is a blond, really he is and there is nothing wrong with it. I do prefer the blond guys that look manly, what would of happened if Patrick Mcgoohan was hired. Someone would moan about him being a curly haired Blond Bond. But I personally feel he is attractive in the same vein as Sean Connery in some ways. At least he is not trying to be sexy, and what the hell was this walking out of the water in shorts by DC? Trying to make himself sexy more like.

Post by **Kristatos** » Sat Jan 26, 2008 6:41 pm

tiswas wrote:And apparantly why is there no Bond Film about the terrorism in the Mid-East.
That maybe a worthy bond film for Daniel Craig to tackle.

Craig vetoed the idea of the terrorists in CR being Islamists, because he thought it would be tasteless for escapist entertainment like the Bond films to be so close to real world events. I have to say I agree with him. Even during the cold war, the villains were usually rogue Russian generals or SPECTRE rather than the goverment of the USSR.

stockslivevan · Post by **stockslivevan** » Sun Jan 27, 2008 4:15 am

Craig and EON are right, having middle eastern villains is too hot right now. I mean you make the slightest mistake and you'd end up targeting yourself by offending some extremist group that doesn't understand the concept of fiction.

EON doesn't want to get involved in a political scandal over a film.

tiswas · Post by **tiswas** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 10:38 am

Pierce Brosnon actually thinks he is James Bond. In your dreams darling.

Post by **Kristatos** » Mon Feb 04, 2008 1:15 pm

tiswas wrote:Pierce Brosnon actually thinks he is James Bond. In your dreams darling.

What are you talking about? Brosnan was an actor playing a role. I've never seen any indication of him suffering from the blurring between reality and drama that occasionally afflicts actors (most tragically in Heath Ledger's case).

Post by **Dr. No** » Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:56 am

What the hell is this? Seriously the Mods need to lock it.
First the topic is idiotic and misspelled. Second members here tired to have an intelligent conversation and got nothing in return. (yes I'm talking about Stocks, Kris, and Skywalker

)

no offense tiswas but if you don't even know the name of the actor you are talking about how can any of us take you seriously.

I do not rate Brosnon either

Classic Bond Forum

I do not rate Brosnon

I do not rate Brosnon

Re: I do not rate Brosnon

Re: I do not rate Brosnon