The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

General Bond discussion from Sean Connery to Pierce Brosnan
Post Reply
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14841
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Swine flu or not, does Wolverine top $75 million in the USA this weekend? Star Trek looks bigger than forecasted.
Image
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14841
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

katied wrote:And Craig isn't. Doesn't surpise me.He's not on a par with any of the other people that are on the walk of fame.
Craig is non-existent now and no talk of any future non-Bond starring roles, or are there?
Image
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

bjmdds wrote:
katied wrote:And Craig isn't. Doesn't surpise me.He's not on a par with any of the other people that are on the walk of fame.
Craig is non-existent now and no talk of any future non-Bond starring roles, or are there?
If there are non-Bond films,the'll probabaly sink like a stone.I heard rumors about a sequel to Flashbacks Of A Fool. The only thing I have to say to that is "why?" :|
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14841
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

katied wrote:
bjmdds wrote:
katied wrote:And Craig isn't. Doesn't surpise me.He's not on a par with any of the other people that are on the walk of fame.
Craig is non-existent now and no talk of any future non-Bond starring roles, or are there?
If there are non-Bond films,the'll probabaly sink like a stone.I heard rumors about a sequel to Flashbacks Of A Fool. The only thing I have to say to that is "why?" :|
Sequel to a film that closed up in 1 week here?
Image
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

Sequel to a film that closed up in 1 week here?
And was only in one movie theater in the U.S. If that isn't a flop I don't know what is! :twisted:
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 13009
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

bjmdds wrote:
katied wrote:And Craig isn't. Doesn't surpise me.He's not on a par with any of the other people that are on the walk of fame.
Craig is non-existent now and no talk of any future non-Bond starring roles, or are there?
Well, his IMDb entry only shows Bond 23 and his small role in the Tintin movie (which I thought had been cancelled due to an inability to secure financing, but maybe it's back on again - I hope so, cos I want to see it) in Craig's future. You'll probably regard that as good news, but I don't, because it means he'll probably want to stick with the Bond franchise until he's pushing 60, like Roger did, to his later regret.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

I don't want Daniel Craig to fail....but let's face it.He kind of has with his non-Bond films.I seriously think he sabotages his career because he picks these non-Bond scrips that turn out to be, by and large,flops.
oscartheman
Agent
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: America

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by oscartheman »

Craigs continued failure reinforces how wrong he is for 007.Is there a role that he will not suck at.Nobody has found one yet.Big budget high profile movies tumble to their knees with Craig on the banner.Before 007 he could not find a toe hold to save him the only difference is today he is hand picking them.The man is not meant to headline a lice commercial.
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

oscartheman wrote:Craigs continued failure reinforces how wrong he is for 007.Is there a role that he will not suck at.Nobody has found one yet.Big budget high profile movies tumble to their knees with Craig on the banner.Before 007 he could not find a toe hold to save him the only difference is today he is hand picking them.The man is not meant to headline a lice commercial.
Defiance is a good example.It had potential, despite the subject matter, but Daniel Craig =box office poison :?
oscartheman
Agent
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: America

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by oscartheman »

katied wrote:
oscartheman wrote:Craigs continued failure reinforces how wrong he is for 007.Is there a role that he will not suck at.Nobody has found one yet.Big budget high profile movies tumble to their knees with Craig on the banner.Before 007 he could not find a toe hold to save him the only difference is today he is hand picking them.The man is not meant to headline a lice commercial.
Defiance is a good example.It had potential, despite the subject matter, but Daniel Craig =box office poison :?
And he was not the actor that got the buzz from that one.The new Sabertooth got the all attention and praise.What Craig got was asked to stop taking himself so seriously.
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

What Craig got was asked to stop taking himself so seriously.

Maybe that's the thinking with the Tin Tin movie.It isn't even that big of a part but again:Box office poison. :?
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14841
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Jackman with Wolverine opened with over $85 million in the USA this weekend. This guy could increase Bond 22's take by 20% probably in Bond 23, if Eon acts quickly.
Image
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

Look out Bond...Wolverine was *awesome* 8)
User avatar
stockslivevan
SPECTRE 02
Posts: 3249
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:13 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia with Love
Location: Crab Key

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by stockslivevan »

bjmdds wrote:Jackman with Wolverine opened with over $85 million in the USA this weekend. This guy could increase Bond 22's take by 20% probably in Bond 23, if Eon acts quickly.
They won't BJ. ;)
I think it's common knowledge that the success comes from the fact that this is an X-Men film rather than Hugh Jackman starring in it. Leave it to BJ to not acknowledge that nor the reviews which seem to be quite a bit more unfriendly than even QOS got. :wink:
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 13009
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

stockslivevan wrote:I think it's common knowledge that the success comes from the fact that this is an X-Men film rather than Hugh Jackman starring in it. Leave it to BJ to not acknowledge that nor the reviews which seem to be quite a bit more unfriendly than even QOS got. :wink:
Plus, didn't Jackman already turn down the role of Bond? Or at least Wikipedia said he did, for what that's worth.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
oscartheman
Agent
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: America

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by oscartheman »

Kristatos wrote:
stockslivevan wrote:I think it's common knowledge that the success comes from the fact that this is an X-Men film rather than Hugh Jackman starring in it. Leave it to BJ to not acknowledge that nor the reviews which seem to be quite a bit more unfriendly than even QOS got. :wink:
Plus, didn't Jackman already turn down the role of Bond? Or at least Wikipedia said he did, for what that's worth.
If it's on the internet it must be true :lol: Wasn't the story Jackman told is he was approached about Bond and after asked for a script Eon never got back with him?
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

oscartheman wrote:
Kristatos wrote:
stockslivevan wrote:I think it's common knowledge that the success comes from the fact that this is an X-Men film rather than Hugh Jackman starring in it. Leave it to BJ to not acknowledge that nor the reviews which seem to be quite a bit more unfriendly than even QOS got. :wink:
Plus, didn't Jackman already turn down the role of Bond? Or at least Wikipedia said he did, for what that's worth.
If it's on the internet it must be true :lol: Wasn't the story Jackman told is he was approached about Bond and after asked for a script Eon never got back with him?
Sounds about right for EON :mrgreen:
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14841
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Never say never. This Craig farce MUST end. He has become quite boring to be honest, in and out of Bond. Eon does not even seem in any rush for Bond 23 with Craig.
Image
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

bjmdds wrote:Never say never. This Craig farce MUST end. He has become quite boring to be honest, in and out of Bond. Eon does not even seem in any rush for Bond 23 with Craig.
I have so little faith in Barbara Broccoli's taste in men that are suitable for Bond it's not even funny :?
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14841
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

She is definitely "Alicia Silverstone Clueless" about Bond, that is for sure.
Image
Post Reply