I have to say, I thought the title `John Carter' absolutely bizarre for the type of film and genre it belongs to.Mazer Rackham wrote:At least Carter does the service of outing the Hollywood numbers a little more.
When gleefully writing about the Disney massive misstep reporters actually do a little digging to find out it did not cost $250m rather $350m (someplace have $300m + P&R cost). These guys never estimate or check P&R but it is the determining factor on whether or not these big budget movies make any money. So now the story is John Carter of Mars need to make $600 to $700m to break even. Some places are saying $600m is the break even mark and its not. Gee what other $250+m films that were reported in the last few years as massive successes actually didn't break even, nobody will have the balls to write that story.
John Carter might be remember as a Disney marketing screwup, it is the grandaddy of the the scifi adventures which nobody knew what it supposed to be about. It maybe a decent movie that could have spawned a lucrative franchise, sadly it was marked before it was ever release.
http://thejohncarterfiles.com/2012/03/j ... wood-flop/
John Carter sounds more like a 70's cop movie about a renegade detective called John Carter....or a gangster flick about someone called John Carter.
When I saw the trailer, my immediate thoughts was that it could be a potential huge disaster, due to the inappropiate title.



