bjmdds wrote:Seydoux said they will explore her masculine side and Bond's "feminine" side

DONE

Morons

They just don't get it. Women are secondary in a Bond film, fact. Bond IS the hero, the ONLY character that matters. Adding women and elevating their importance to gun-toting field agents like Moneypenny, or any M being given more than 5 minutes of screen time is wrong for the franchise. It's not sexist, it's just THAT's the allure of Bond, James Bond, and redefining characters to new ethnicities for politically correct inclusion is poetic injustice to Fleming as well. This all started with Dench's M's influence over Brosnan and now it's Broccoli's influence over Cr-egg's role in the franchise.
Couldn't agree more with that assessment, BJ. I know it isn't sexist, it's how Babs interprets the Classic Bond. Women being masculine, men being feminine? Why not just swap roles? Seydoux to play Bond, and Craig to play the Bond Girl. Oh Christ, why am I even bothering? Like I said, like FBF said, Bond is now for corrupted societies. If we were to restore the recipe, we should support the alikes of
Kingsman: The Secret Service and the soon-to-be-ill-fated
Section 6. Gadgets, manly heroes, lovely ladies as seductive as they can be, megalomaniac intensive villains, gentleman-esque tuxedoes, martinis, fancy locations, and that's that.