kater23 wrote:Omega wrote:Is your dad doing well?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Yep! He got a good report at the doctor when he went to a check-up on Tuesday-doing much better than expected!


kater23 wrote:Omega wrote:Is your dad doing well?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Yep! He got a good report at the doctor when he went to a check-up on Tuesday-doing much better than expected!
I hope there's an extended edition of the movie.bjmdds wrote:Just saw Godzilla. It was OK, not great, because too much emphasis was on people and families and not enough emphasis on the monsters.
I read that Mothra would be like the Joker of Godzilla films in the sequel.It has a nice 73% approval rating. I want Mothra in the sequel, not so much character studies, and better editing too, for scenes went from one locale to another without enough explanation.
LOTR and Gladiator are one of them. I would also want to add Harry Potter and TDK Trilogy (I know John P. Drake would hate me for this.) in there as well.Omega wrote:Since 2000, the last 14 years what are the truly memorable movies that will become classics? In my own list it's probably less than 40 excellent to great movies out if thousands made.
Who was it who said that 95% of everything is garbage? I haven't done a scientific survey, but I suspect that if you took any 14-year period of movie history, the proportion of classics to filler would be about the same. And there has always been a distinction between actors (who can play a variety of different roles) and stars (who are the same in every movie). John Wayne was always John Wayne, Humphrey Bogart was always Humphrey Bogart and so on. It's what people pay to see.Omega wrote: Since 2000, the last 14 years what are the truly memorable movies that will become classics? In my own list it's probably less than 40 excellent to great movies out if thousands made.
To me those men are Icons. There are three type of movie stars: Actors= People who can convey emotion really well and bring a role to life, Stars= People who collect a check for appearing in a film and being famous, and Icons= People who are great at being themselves and that persona exudes for lack of a better word "coolness". People like Wayne, Bogart, Connery and Eastwood weren't great "actors" but they were great at who they were. They had gravitas on film they presented a certain presence that make watching them enjoyable. We have a few "actors" today, way too many "stars" but who are this generation's "icons"? I don't see any.Kristatos wrote:Who was it who said that 95% of everything is garbage? I haven't done a scientific survey, but I suspect that if you took any 14-year period of movie history, the proportion of classics to filler would be about the same. And there has always been a distinction between actors (who can play a variety of different roles) and stars (who are the same in every movie). John Wayne was always John Wayne, Humphrey Bogart was always Humphrey Bogart and so on. It's what people pay to see.Omega wrote: Since 2000, the last 14 years what are the truly memorable movies that will become classics? In my own list it's probably less than 40 excellent to great movies out if thousands made.
You may have a point. There are probably thousands of movies from the 1970s and 80s I never heard of but I feel today's movies lack originality for one and inspiration for another. Is craig a big star? not really, out of Bond he nothing. Tatum, LaBeouf, Kitsch, Pine, are nothing like the old actors, even if try to compare them to Dalton. IMO too many "Stars" are chosen for the wrong reasons, meaning they can be marketed easier because they are like another actor who they already have the PR worked out for.Kristatos wrote:Who was it who said that 95% of everything is garbage? I haven't done a scientific survey, but I suspect that if you took any 14-year period of movie history, the proportion of classics to filler would be about the same. And there has always been a distinction between actors (who can play a variety of different roles) and stars (who are the same in every movie). John Wayne was always John Wayne, Humphrey Bogart was always Humphrey Bogart and so on. It's what people pay to see.Omega wrote: Since 2000, the last 14 years what are the truly memorable movies that will become classics? In my own list it's probably less than 40 excellent to great movies out if thousands made.
I'd agree with those choices. Out side specialty franchises like LOTR, Star Wars, TDK, HP, people will be watching those movie 50 years form now. IMO modern movies are not as good as they used to be. But Kirs has a point too.FormerBondFan wrote:LOTR and Gladiator are one of them. I would also want to add Harry Potter and TDK Trilogy (I know John P. Drake would hate me for this.) in there as well.Omega wrote:Since 2000, the last 14 years what are the truly memorable movies that will become classics? In my own list it's probably less than 40 excellent to great movies out if thousands made.