Batman Begins or Casino Royale?

General Bond discussion from Sean Connery to Pierce Brosnan
Post Reply
User avatar
Jedi007
Lieutenant-Commander
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:04 am
Location: Inside an invisible Aston Martin

Batman Begins or Casino Royale?

Post by Jedi007 »

Two questions:

1. What franchise really needs a reboot?
2. Between the two, what is the best reboot?

For question#1: I'd go for Batman, Batman and Robin is so Joel Schumacher, so gay. As for James Bond, reboot or not, they could still make more films.
BOND sells, NOT CRAIG
The reboot is a risky area, did Eon need to do it? NO. Did this confuse alot of people? YES.
The Bond character will always be anchored in the values of the 60s
Image
User avatar
stockslivevan
SPECTRE 02
Posts: 3249
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:13 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia with Love
Location: Crab Key

Post by stockslivevan »

1) Not sure, I can't think of a franchise that needs it.
2) Hard to say. I think they are both quite excellent and are great examples of a successful reboot. Bale and Craig are one of my favorite actors too.

Stopping after DAD and B&R was the right thing to do.


Image
Image
User avatar
carl stromberg
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence
Posts: 4489
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:15 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: The Spy Who Loved Me
Favorite Movies: Amicus compendium horror films
It's a Gift
A Night At The Opera
The Return of the Pink Panther
Sons of the Desert
Location: The Duck Inn

Post by carl stromberg »

I preferred Batman Begins. Casino Royale was not really "Bond begins". They should have made a proper Bond begins with a young actor or made another one of those Bond films that have been so popular for the last 40 years.
Bring back Bond!
User avatar
Jedi007
Lieutenant-Commander
Posts: 192
Joined: Wed Feb 14, 2007 11:04 am
Location: Inside an invisible Aston Martin

Post by Jedi007 »

Not sure, I can't think of a franchise that needs it.
I was referring to the Batman and Bond franchises.
BOND sells, NOT CRAIG
The reboot is a risky area, did Eon need to do it? NO. Did this confuse alot of people? YES.
The Bond character will always be anchored in the values of the 60s
Image
User avatar
stockslivevan
SPECTRE 02
Posts: 3249
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:13 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia with Love
Location: Crab Key

Post by stockslivevan »

Jedi007 wrote:
Not sure, I can't think of a franchise that needs it.
I was referring to the Batman and Bond franchises.
Ah okay. Both. And that is exactly what I got. :wink:
User avatar
Skywalker
002
Posts: 1736
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 8:11 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Live and Let Die
Goldfinger
The Spy Who Loved Me
Quantum of Solace.......Hmmm
Favorite Movies: Batman Begins
The Dark Knoght
Shawshank Redemption
Platoon
Top Gun
Aliens
Location: On the side of truth and honesty. No room for sheep - just shepherds.
Contact:

Post by Skywalker »

I enjoyed Batman Begins and it was nice to see where it all started. That said, a reboot wasn't needed. Bond did not need a reboot either.
“I'd like to thank the Royal Marines for bringing me in like that and scaring the s--- out of me,” Bond Hardman Daniel Craig.
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Post by Mazer Rackham »

bond begins should of started with Bond orphaned and then checking in on him as he grows up to become Bond. Every step of the way becoming more and more what Connery is. It's why batman begins worked. Batman was Batman not Bruce Wayne.
User avatar
stockslivevan
SPECTRE 02
Posts: 3249
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:13 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia with Love
Location: Crab Key

Post by stockslivevan »

Mazer Rackham wrote:bond begins should of started with Bond orphaned and then checking in on him as he grows up to become Bond. Every step of the way becoming more and more what Connery is. It's why batman begins worked. Batman was Batman not Bruce Wayne.
I think that not covering Bond's life before he became a OO-Agent is what makes his character unique, he's very mysterious. You know nothing about his personal life besides the women he fell for.
Jermaine76
Lieutenant
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 4:01 am
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Contact:

Post by Jermaine76 »

Skywalker wrote:I enjoyed Batman Begins and it was nice to see where it all started. That said, a reboot wasn't needed. Bond did not need a reboot either.
I agree with you on this. Not now anyway.
Jermaine76
Lieutenant
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 4:01 am
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Contact:

Post by Jermaine76 »

Mazer Rackham wrote:bond begins should of started with Bond orphaned and then checking in on him as he grows up to become Bond. Every step of the way becoming more and more what Connery is. It's why batman begins worked. Batman was Batman not Bruce Wayne.
This is what I was expecting to see when CR came out, but was disappointed. The other day, some co-workers and myself were talking about CR and how the reboot should have been a real reboot from the beginning and not the "Cliff-Notes" version we got. The only problem is that if EON would have done a reboot starting from Bond's childhood, then people would automatically assume that Bond was coping off of Batman and then we would diss it for that.
Jermaine76
Lieutenant
Posts: 95
Joined: Sun May 20, 2007 4:01 am
Location: Frederick, Maryland
Contact:

Post by Jermaine76 »

stockslivevan wrote:
Mazer Rackham wrote:bond begins should of started with Bond orphaned and then checking in on him as he grows up to become Bond. Every step of the way becoming more and more what Connery is. It's why batman begins worked. Batman was Batman not Bruce Wayne.
I think that not covering Bond's life before he became a OO-Agent is what makes his character unique, he's very mysterious. You know nothing about his personal life besides the women he fell for.
This was something else I was talking about the other day. If the reboot would had started with Bond's childhood...then it would be possible to lose his mysterious trait that we all love. It would be similar to how we look at Darth Vader now after the prequels. Now we look at him more as a victim more than a hardcore villain.
Post Reply