bjmdds wrote:Ale, you seem to know a LOT about Henry's personal regimens.If Immortals does very well, he might lose his appetite for Bond and if Superman does well, he might want more serious roles. It will be YOUR responsibility to keep Henry yearning for the Bond role. I do not want any talk of that bow and arrow Robin Hood archer guy or Michael Fass-bendover to be the next Bond for IF the green vegetable chooses that dead flesh after Cr-egg's rotten run, I will be DONE with this franchise
I will not endure another decade of Bond rubbish after the pile Cr-egg shoveled. It's Jackman/Cavill or end the franchise
FBF, today on ABC they did a segment on comic book movies and they said "look for Star Trek 2" NEXT year
We need it completed and released for Thanksgiving 2012 to join the Twilight bunch and the Hobbit and bury the Cr-egg disaster and it will time time to use the 'elder wand' on his Bond career
LOL! The best part is I knew about his personal regimens WAY before he spoke about those publicly



I will be done myself if Fass-bendover (LMAO awesome) is so much as considered, but I don't think he's a contender. The fanboys keep talking about him because he's the carbon copy of Craig (just a better actor than him), but it's just not going to happen. About archer guy from Robin Hood though I DO think he could be good. I have watched him on that (not finished watching yet but seen a few) and he does have that Bondian quality to himself. He's obviously nowhere near as perfect as Jackman or Cavill would be, but I'll take him over Fass-bendover ANY day. I'm really trying to think of other names but I can't come up with any good ones yet. I must watch Downton Abbey, maybe someone from there will show good qualities. My problem with the whole thing is that there really is NOBODY out there who is as perfect as Henry Cavill for the part. (or Hugh Jackman, but Henry has age on his side too).So whoever I think of, I'm like "Oh could work. But wouldn't be "perfect"".