Like Kristatos said, irony is he's the only one getting any praise apparently. Guess he knew what he was dealing with and thought he'd better run, despite his good effortbjmdds wrote:"A week after its release, the L.A. Times reported that Sheridan (My Left Foot and In America) had, at one point, asked the Directors Guild of America to remove his name from the film. Dream House was shot in Toronto back in January of 2010 and was scheduled to open last February. But, first, reshoots were called for and the production company, Morgan’s Creek Productions, took the film away from Sheridan, who then petitioned the DGA to have his name removed.
Eventually a compromise was reached, though the creative schism seems to have ruined the film. The movie’s official trailer, attempting to focus on the horror angle, casually gives away the central psychological plot twist. It’s no surprise that Sheridan declined to do any promotion for the film. Weisz and Craig were also apparently unhappy with the final cut made by Morgan Creek and refused to do press or promotion for the picture."
It's the Craigster effect! we were commenting exactly about this in the Bond 23/news section and it's yet another of those d**n things that makes me think Bond 23 is going to be American Beauty: the Bond Years. And I certainly do NOT mean that as a compliment, but as in it seems like they're handling this ALL wrong and the same exact awful way as QoS. Good Lord. I hope it doesn't tank the franchise for good, but if this is how it's going, they're gonna get a good opening day (out of curiosity people WILL go on the first day) and then they're going to PLUMMET.More wonderful news: "The actor could not reveal much about the role or about the newest Bond flick, but he’s had the role in mind for months.
"They're changing the whole thing, the whole dynamic," Bardem said. "I'd be playing Bond's nemesis, yes, but it's not that obvious. Everything is more nuanced. It's very intriguing."
bowl of putrid porridge LMAO!http://honoluluweekly.com/film/current- ... g-lessons/ "Daniel Craig (shirtless and clueless)" / " This movie is a strong contender for the worst of the year. This thing, in a word, stinks." How can EON keep pimping this bowl of putrid porridge as their lead actor?
you NEVER fail to deliver, BJ. As far as EON, the answer is: because they're EON! Extremely Overtly Negligent!They will have to use several layers of fake tan. Maybe they should use some CGI on his face as fake tan can only do so much.
I say go CGI on his face... the fake tan can only hide that much. I can't believe we have to have THIS type of talk about JAMES BOND. WHAT THE HELL!!!! 
I am SO glad about Person of Interest.. frankly I don't always hold out much hope for stuff I like because well, I tend to like stuff that sometimes is too well-made for everyone to understand how good it is, especially in the days of Jersey freaking Shore. But this one seems to have reverted the trend and I am SO glad about it. I want to puke at the idea Grey's Anatomy does BETTER in the 18-49 demo generally speaking, but I'm just glad my new favorite show is definitely doing well.9 p.m.
CBS: "Person of Interest" (11.9 million, 7.4/11)
FOX: "The X Factor" (11.1 million, 6.5/10)
ABC: "Grey's Anatomy" (9.7 million, 6.5/10)
NBC: "The Office" (6.05 million, 3.6/6)/"Whitney" (4.2 million, 2.7/4)
The CW: "The Secret Circle" (1.8 million, 1.2/2) Ale's Person Of Interest is now numero uno at 9:00pm beating out Cowell's bombing X Factor at 9:00pm. She knows her onions, does our Miss AleI think she deserves a brunch with the green vegetable.
You give me that meeting BJ, and I guarantee two results: Craigster being given the boot (and I will take the pleasure of doing that myself while wearing stilettos) and the green vegetable being aaaall over Henry Cavill so much so that she'll hire him in a SECOND. I'll then take care of the rest
(get rid of her and whatnot LOL)
At least it's a sequel and not a remake, and Tony Scott and Tom Cruise will most likely be involved....
