y dont u like him?

markowen4lyf · Post by **markowen4lyf** » Wed May 23, 2007 6:28 am

im editing what i put - i was alittle too strong.

i dont think that some of the reasons people give to why they dont like daniel craig are right. just cos he doesnt look like your traditional bond doesnt make him worse. I thought he was really good in casino royale.

stockslivevan · Post by **stockslivevan** » Wed May 23, 2007 6:41 am

Welcome.

Before you start assuming attacking me for telling you this, I am not a DCINBer, I think Craig is second to Connery.

Now that we got that out of the way, you need to stop this caps lock nonsense. There are actually reasonable people in this site with legitimate views, it's not the same site like it was a year ago. So don't come in here and knock on my friends for having different opinions. There is more to their views of Craig than simply having a lighter hair color.

Redeem yourself.

Post by **Skywalker** » Wed May 23, 2007 7:02 am

stockslivevan wrote:Welcome.

Before you start assuming attacking me for telling you this, I am not a DCINBer, I think Craig is second to Connery.

Now that we got that out of the way, you need to stop this caps lock nonsense. There are actually reasonable people in this site with legitimate views, it's not the same site like it was a year ago. So don't come in here and knock on my friends for having different opinions. There is more to their views of Craig than simply having a lighter hair color.

Redeem yourself.

I wasn't going to bother replying, but your reply pretty much said it all.

Well said Stock.

Post by **The Sweeney** » Wed May 23, 2007 7:55 am

Skywalker wrote:
stockslivevan wrote:Welcome.

Before you start assuming attacking me for telling you this, I am not a DCINBer, I think Craig is second to Connery.

Now that we got that out of the way, you need to stop this caps lock nonsense. There are actually reasonable people in this site with legitimate views, it's not the same site like it was a year ago. So don't come in here and knock on my friends for having different opinions. There is more to their views of Craig than simply having a lighter hair color.

Redeem yourself.
I wasn't going to bother replying, but your reply pretty much said it all.

Well said Stock.

Moron!!

I doubt very much we'll be seeing him on here again....

Post by **carl stromberg** » Wed May 23, 2007 10:36 am

You are welcome to post some more constructive views!

We welcome anyone - even Take That fans.

Post by **The Sweeney** » Wed May 23, 2007 10:38 am

carl stromberg wrote:You are welcome to post some more constructive views!

We welcome anyone - even Take That fans.

Carl, you are waaaay too nice to be a moderator....

paco chaos · Post by **paco chaos** » Wed May 23, 2007 2:38 pm

geez, someone pee'd in this guys cheerios.
welcome to the board markowen4lyf. maybe we'd like to hear what you have to say after you tone it down a notch.

Post by **Skywalker** » Wed May 23, 2007 4:14 pm

paco chaos wrote:geez, someone pee'd in this guys cheerios.
welcome to the board markowen4lyf. maybe we'd like to hear what you have to say after you tone it down a notch.

Are you sure it's a guy?

Post by **Kristatos** » Wed May 23, 2007 4:20 pm

Skywalker wrote:Are you sure it's a guy?

Judging by the user name and Caps Locked writing style, it appears to be a teenage girl who got frozen in time around 1995, or whenever it was that Take That were popular, and who has only just been thawed out. Wish they'd bloody left her there.

Captain Nash · Post by **Captain Nash** » Wed May 23, 2007 4:34 pm

I have a feeling the newest member is going to fit in fine.
Male or female it matters not. And as Stocks said, we're not all in the anti-Craig brigade.
Welcome to the mad house, markowen4lyf.

Post by **Skywalker** » Wed May 23, 2007 9:42 pm

Kristatos wrote:
Skywalker wrote:Are you sure it's a guy?
Judging by the user name and Caps Locked writing style, it appears to be a teenage girl who got frozen in time around 1995, or whenever it was that Take That were popular, and who has only just been thawed out. Wish they'd bloody left her there.

Very good Kris.

Captain Nash · Post by **Captain Nash** » Wed May 23, 2007 11:01 pm

Just because our new member may not share the same opinion as many here, does that mean we have to be insulting in our replies?
It's not doing any favours for the site by having people bash anyone who disagrees with the whole anti-Craig thing. No matter how much it's changed since the forums were created. There are still alot of people out there that obviously see this site as one sided and full of morons.

Post by **Kristatos** » Thu May 24, 2007 1:37 am

Captain Nash wrote:Just because our new member may not share the same opinion as many here, does that mean we have to be insulting in our replies?

Well, stocks and Sweeney were not exactly complimentary either, so it obviously is not just because he/she/it expressed pro-Craig opinions.

paco chaos · Post by **paco chaos** » Thu May 24, 2007 3:05 am

Kristatos wrote:
Skywalker wrote:Are you sure it's a guy?
Judging by the user name and Caps Locked writing style, it appears to be a teenage girl who got frozen in time around 1995, or whenever it was that Take That were popular, and who has only just been thawed out. Wish they'd bloody left her there.

okay, this has to be one of those things that got lost over the Atlantic, since I only know of Take That in the vaguest of terms.
I know Robbie Williams was one of them, and they were a British version of New Kids On the Block. I take it that Mark Owen was one of them? because I thought it was the person posting's actual name. sorry.

Captain Nash · Post by **Captain Nash** » Thu May 24, 2007 4:52 am

Kristatos wrote:
Captain Nash wrote:Just because our new member may not share the same opinion as many here, does that mean we have to be insulting in our replies?
Well, stocks and Sweeney were not exactly complimentary either, so it obviously is not just because he/she/it expressed pro-Craig opinions.

I see your point.

Post by **Kristatos** » Thu May 24, 2007 1:05 pm

paco chaos wrote:okay, this has to be one of those things that got lost over the Atlantic, since I only know of Take That in the vaguest of terms.
I know Robbie Williams was one of them, and they were a British version of New Kids On the Block. I take it that Mark Owen was one of them? because I thought it was the person posting's actual name. sorry.

Yeah, they were popular in the early 90's, which is why I find it weird that someone who writes like a teenager should use the name of someone from a band that split up over 10 years ago. It's like being trapped in a time warp.

Post by **Skywalker** » Thu May 24, 2007 6:54 pm

Kristatos wrote:
paco chaos wrote:okay, this has to be one of those things that got lost over the Atlantic, since I only know of Take That in the vaguest of terms.
I know Robbie Williams was one of them, and they were a British version of New Kids On the Block. I take it that Mark Owen was one of them? because I thought it was the person posting's actual name. sorry.
Yeah, they were popular in the early 90's, which is why I find it weird that someone who writes like a teenager should use the name of someone from a band that split up over 10 years ago. It's like being trapped in a time warp.

They had a reunion recently and have had success with a number 1 single and album.

Post by **Dr. No** » Thu May 24, 2007 7:19 pm

I will not take anyone typing in all caps seriously. Its crude and rude to everyone reading it. (I know the point was to be rude)

a British version of New Kids On the Block? what did the Brits do to deserve that?
oh, yea they gave us the Spice Girls

Post by **Kristatos** » Thu May 24, 2007 7:35 pm

Skywalker wrote:They had a reunion recently and have had success with a number 1 single and album.

Shows how out of touch I am

But was it teenagers buying the album/single, or nostalgic thirtysomethings?

Jermaine76 · Post by **Jermaine76** » Thu May 24, 2007 11:27 pm

markowen4lyf wrote:CANT YOU ALL JUST GROW UP AND ACCEPT THAT DANIEL CRAIG IS BOND. HE DID A BLOODY GOOD JOB AT CASINO ROYALE AND YOU ARE ALL SAD TO SET UP A WEBSITE - JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT AGREE WITH THE CASTING! HE MAY BE BLOND OR YOU MIGHT NOT LIKE HOW HE LOOKS BUT JEEZ HOW SUPERFICIAL ARE YOU?

1. Don't type in all caps.
2. Craig is a BLOODY horrible job as James Bond. If you want to debate against me or others about it then thats fine. I already know what you're responses are going to be anyway. Most if not all pro-Craig people say the same 3 or 4 things about him. See, anti-Craiggers are on point. We have lots and detailed infomation as for why Gollum, I mean Craig is not Bond. One of the guys from this site broke it down in detail for all these people on swear up and down that Craig is Fleming's Bond when he really isn't.

Classic Bond Forum

y dont u like him?

y dont u like him?

Re: YOU PEOPLE ARE HORRID