Omega wrote:Kristatos wrote:
It did even worse on Rotten Tomatoes, 21%, though most critics blame the script rather than Reynolds. What's happened to Martin Campbell? He did
Goldeneye and
The Mask of Zorro, both of which were fine adventure films, and then followed them up with vastly inferior sequels. Now this. He seems to have lost it.
21% it went up since last night, so far 85% of the audience on RT like it, could be studio plants takes a little while for the real numbers to come in. I noticed at some movies site there will be an early showing of praise when the movie is hardly out
People forget Campbell made Zorro 2 a suck fest. I don't think he did a good job with CR it was too boring. It like saying Steven Spielberg recent movies suck, but he made Saving Private Ryan and ET! Except for the Bourne editing QOS with Campbell would still suck hard.
See I never even look at early reviews because most of that stuff is either piloted by the studios OR by rivals... Once it's widely released, we'll see. Meantime to prove the whole "It sucks" doesn't matter one bit, the movie did JUST FINE in midnight showings, made more than Thor and the same as X-Men... so I'd wait. Regardless, Reynolds is not the one at fault here, it's the script. I like him and I very much liked him in "The Proposal" with Sandra Bullock, there again they had a very good script there, not coincidentally penned by my boys Orci&Kurtzman... so of course he can't do miracles. I completely agree on QoS, there was no saving that. Not even Pierce or Cavill would have saved that crapfest. I also agree on CR, I NEVER liked CR either. While being better than QoS (which doesn't really take much) it was the most boring Bond movie EVER. As I said many times, my father, who is the one who introduced me to Bond as a TODDLER (LOL) fell ASLEEP during CR. He said not only it was boring as you-know-what, but also "THAT DUDE!? He's got NOTHING of Bond. Absolutely nothing. And he's UGLY" (and I mean, it's my dad, not really one who makes such remarks unless he's really put off by someone's looks

). So yeah, Campbell did fine when he had what he needed and wanted. I'm sure CR would have been a completely different movie had Henry Cavill been the protagonist, and that's probably why when Campbell found himself saddled with Craig, he just delivered a poor product. He didn't want to do it and he had envisaged a totally different movie, so he just had to make do with what he was given instead.