Should Roger Moore Still Be Bond?

[007]

Roger Moore should come back as 007. They could remake all the films he wasn't in or at least use CGI to insert him over the offending Bond actors. It's been too long since Bond took someone out with a karate chop to the back of the neck.

[TheScashMan]

If you could form your own opinions instead of imitating mine, then that would be perhaps the single biggest achievement you could ever hope to master in your miserable life.

[Capt. Sir Dominic Flandry]

I'll see both of you in court.

[The Sweeney]

Anyone who cannot see that this man could still play a dashing secret agent, bedding loads of broads, performing miracle stunts, and beating up every guy in the room, must be crazy.

This man could easily still play Bond. The man doesn't look a day over 35. A few more images to back up this statement - http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/nqVaxkaR ... oger+Moore

[Captain Nash]

Roger Moore should come back as 007. They could remake all the films he wasn't in or at least use CGI to insert him over the offending Bond actors. It's been too long since Bond took someone out with a karate chop to the back of the neck.

I think it was Pierce in GE to Xenia?

[Captain Nash]

I am a douchebag. People should ignore me instead. Having anyone reply to my post is perhaps the single biggest achievement I could ever hope to master in my miserable life.

Not a member of TrollsrUs are you?
I'm going to return to a site I was banned from, but I'll let one of the mods know.

That was classic.

[TheScashMan]

Captain Nash... is that you Benny?

Well, I WAS trying to buy some time during my previous stay at that place, could you tell? Of course, I didn't want to befriend you, and only said as such because I didn't want a dictator like you locking my threads from the get-go. Predictably, you were too pig-ignorant to even reply, but at least I managed to get a few good days of strong, solid discussion with many of the members at mi6forums who were actually pretty darn pleased to have me back! Even those who previously disliked me realised that, once I had left, the place had reverted back to the boring cesspit it has now once again become.

The problem with you is this: you offer absoutely ZERO quality to any of your posts, your opinions are worthless and you will never kick-start interesting discussion nor do you properly contribute when one arises.

You may have some ''power'' as an autocratic mod over at that forum, but your natural skills (debate, intellect, logic) are inferior. And you are a prime example of why moderators are NEVER needed in ANY fan forum. Only a single part-time admin is needed, to clean up blatant spam and copyrighted materials. That is all.

[Captain Nash]

What kind of doofus lets a moderator know that they have made a new account, after their first account was banned?

Hi Benny, I remember you when I was once registered here under my Scashy99 account. I've just signed up again and want to make up with the others I had disagreements with. I always got on along well with you, so I'm just saying hi and re-introducing myself.

Scash

You're select group of fans will forget all about Scashy in a week or two. You're a fad. I'm sure you'll attempt to return at some point. And you'll be returned to trollville.
I'm not sure what debate or discussion you believe you're having. I suspect you're on some kind of meds though.
But just so you know. You're not funny. You're not intelligent. And you're banned once again.
I'll sleep soundly knowing that.

[TheScashMan]

What kind of doofus lets a moderator know that they have made a new account, after their first account was banned?

Hi Benny, I remember you when I was once registered here under my Scashy99 account. I've just signed up again and want to make up with the others I had disagreements with. I always got on along well with you, so I'm just saying hi and re-introducing myself.

Scash

You're select group of fans will forget all about Scashy in a week or two. You're a fad. I'm sure you'll attempt to return at some point. And you'll be returned to trollville.
I'm not sure what debate or discussion you believe you're having. I suspect you're on some kind of meds though.
But just so you know. You're not funny. You're not intelligent. And you're banned once again.
I'll sleep soundly knowing that.

Yes I am sure you are happy that only those who want dull, conformist Bond discussions will stay. Your simple mind simply refuses to accept (wise) proposals such as mine about relaunching the Bond franchise (excluding the 7 films Moore has already made) with a radical shake-up. I am certain that Fleming himself would be appalled to see how the franchise has been mistreated. The films SHOULD have been completed years ago as it is, all the delays year in, year out have been pitiful.

[Captain Nash]

So your little bag of tricks consists of the same crap then?
Bring back an 83 year old to play Bond
Certain that Fleming would agree, though he never saw Moore play Bond.
A one trick pony, but still a jacka$$.

[TheScashMan]

So your little bag of tricks consists of the same crap then?
Bring back an 83 year old to play Bond
Certain that Fleming would agree, though he never saw Moore play Bond.
A one trick pony, but still a jacka$$.

Hardly: I have also made many posts including, but not limited to, critiquing the appalling handling of OHMSS, how NSNA should replace Thunderball, not to mention that Octopussy deserved THREE Oscars (explained in much detail I might add). All of my discussion points produced much debate, yet you would rather sit in boredom as yet another simpleton says, "what he said" or ''cool story bro''. How pitiful

If so called fans thought the way I did, then Eon would have a franchise worth caring about. As it stands, only bits and bobs of the Bond franchise are worth watching. The rest is coddswallop!

But, it must be said, the most strongest reaction I get from my posts are from those who refuse to believe Sir Rog (or even Lee and Kiel) could return in their former roles in the Bond series. And that is just disgraceful!

[FormerBondFan]

Rog could still be Bond but only through video game adaptations of his Bonds. It worked with Sean when he voiced Bond for FRWL adaptation.

[katied]

Does the word "Liability" not mean anything here? Sorry, but Sir Rog is NOT in the best of health(Myasthenia Gravis).Being Bond at his age could kill him.

[FormerBondFan]

Does the word "Liability" not mean anything here? Sorry, but Sir Rog is NOT in the best of health(Myasthenia Gravis).Being Bond at his age could kill him.

You got to agree...Scashy!

[katied]

Sir Rog deserves better than to spend what might be the last years of his life making Bond movies(again.)

[The Sweeney]

But, it must be said, the most strongest reaction I get from my posts are from those who refuse to believe Sir Rog (or even Lee and Kiel) could return in their former roles in the Bond series. And that is just disgraceful!

I think its more disgraceful that you actually believe Moore and the pensioner gang are still capable of playing the lead roles in a Bond flick, and that NSNA should replace TB.

With opinions like that, no wonder people think you are trolling on forums. No one on planet earth will agree with most of your opinions, but I guess you already know that.....

[TheScashMan]

But, it must be said, the most strongest reaction I get from my posts are from those who refuse to believe Sir Rog (or even Lee and Kiel) could return in their former roles in the Bond series. And that is just disgraceful!

I think its more disgraceful that you actually believe Moore and the pensioner gang are still capable of playing the lead roles in a Bond flick, and that NSNA should replace TB.

With opinions like that, no wonder people think you are trolling on forums. No one on planet earth will agree with most of your opinions, but I guess you already know that.....

Just because I seem to be in the minority it does not make my assertions any less valid. And I continue to resent the term troll, as it is ALWAYS used by those who are too narrowminded to think of other possibilities other than what their peers think!

[Kristatos]

Just because I seem to be in the minority it does not make my assertions any less valid. And I continue to resent the term troll, as it is ALWAYS used by those who are too narrowminded to think of other possibilities other than what their peers think!

I am still unsure whether you:-

a) are deliberately posting nonsense in order to get a reaction or
b) actually believe something that everyone else regards as self-evidently absurd.

If it's a), then that is the very definition of a troll. If it's b), then no rational argument is possible, since it is purely your subjective opinion that Roger Moore could still play Bond and only looks 49. If you were to say that Sir Roger was born in New York rather than London, then that could be disproved by referring to his autobiography and other documentary sources. But your opinion is your opinion, and it is hard to imagine anything changing your mind.

And before you trot out the tired old "sheeple" line, this is the last place you would be criticised purely for holding a minority opinion. When this place was first set up, the idea that Daniel Craig was anything less than the greatest Bond since Connery was unsayable on most Bond forums, and it was great to have a place where you could criticise Craig and not be attacked for it. However, when you can't find a single person who agrees with you anywhere, then maybe it's time to entertain the possibility that the problem might not be with other people.

[TheScashMan]

I am still unsure whether you:-

a) are deliberately posting nonsense in order to get a reaction or
b) actually believe something that everyone else regards as self-evidently absurd.

If it's a), then that is the very definition of a troll. If it's b), then no rational argument is possible, since it is purely your subjective opinion that Roger Moore could still play Bond and only looks 49. If you were to say that Sir Roger was born in New York rather than London, then that could be disproved by referring to his autobiography and other documentary sources. But your opinion is your opinion, and it is hard to imagine anything changing your mind.

Did you know Sir Rog was 45 during LALD? He looked mid-late twenties! Moore has always been incredibly youthful and Eon should use this to their advantage and re-instate him with immediate effect. His acting stills were far better than any other Bond before, or after, him too!

And before you trot out the tired old "sheeple" line, this is the last place you would be criticised purely for holding a minority opinion. When this place was first set up, the idea that Daniel Craig was anything less than the greatest Bond since Connery was unsayable on most Bond forums, and it was great to have a place where you could criticise Craig and not be attacked for it. However, when you can't find a single person who agrees with you anywhere, then maybe it's time to entertain the possibility that the problem might not be with other people.

Actually, a member called SirAlanSugar at the mi6forums DID agree with me, look at this link (this was where I was arguing the case Octopussy deserved an oscar): http://www.mi6forums.co.uk/viewtopic.ph ... c&start=75

Look down the page and you will see his comment is in support of Moore still being Bond!

[007]

Roger Moore should come back as 007. They could remake all the films he wasn't in or at least use CGI to insert him over the offending Bond actors. It's been too long since Bond took someone out with a karate chop to the back of the neck.

I think it was Pierce in GE to Xenia?

Yes, that's true but it was a modest example of the neck chop. Roger would have taken her head off.