The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

General Bond discussion from Sean Connery to Pierce Brosnan
Post Reply
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

katied wrote:Eh, even with CGI Clash of The Titans looks cheesy(makes me want to watch the original which wasn't much better).
Harry Hamlin with an aged Ursula Andress and Burgess Meredith was lacking.
Image
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

bjmdds wrote:
katied wrote:Eh, even with CGI Clash of The Titans looks cheesy(makes me want to watch the original which wasn't much better).
Harry Hamlin with an aged Ursula Andress and Burgess Meredith was lacking.

Oh yeah..but it is preferable to the remake which looks dreadful :down:
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Have not seen it yet to compare though.
Image
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

I kinda want to Netflix the original Clash Of The Titans before I see the new one.
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Go ahead. I saw it many times. It was not a hit when released. Hercules with Steve Reeves was much better type of film, yet many years earlier.
Image
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 12983
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

katied wrote:Eh, even with CGI Clash of The Titans looks cheesy(makes me want to watch the original which wasn't much better).
The difference is that in the original, the cheesiness is part of the charm. Harryhausen's stop-motion animation is not as slick as CGI, but...one guy did all that! I find it hard to whip up as much appreciation for a team of computer programmers as for a single craftsman like Ray Harryhausen, however much shinier the fruits of the geeks' labours are.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Mazer Rackham »

Freida Pinto & Olivia Wilde have not been signed and neither of them were considering accepting a Bond role. When the tabloid rumors like this sprout up I always want to ask them "with what money?"
Although Olivia Wilde would have been a much better Vesper, shame they went for the odd (old) school teacher and his coworker/lover on vacation look for the romantic couple in CR.

Bond is stuck as long as MGM is stuck. No casting, no hiring a director, no nothing before the funds are freed up. WB put best bid in last week, but was well under what the creditors want. It is a big mess that looks like it will drag on for awhile longer.
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

Mazer Rackham wrote:Freida Pinto & Olivia Wilde have not been signed and neither of them were considering accepting a Bond role. When the tabloid rumors like this sprout up I always want to ask them "with what money?"
Exactly.. If they are forced to scrape the bottom of the barrel for budget reasons, who knows what we'll get,Bond girl wise! :lol:
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 12983
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

katied wrote: Exactly.. If they are forced to scrape the bottom of the barrel for budget reasons, who knows what we'll get,Bond girl wise! :lol:
Is Bond 23 likely to be a low-budget affair, though? Hollywood has never been afraid to throw money after money, and the franchise's history shows that lower-budget Bond films tend to do less well at the box office.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

I don't think they could afford name actresses-like Pinto and Wilde. They would be too expensive, even without money constraints.
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by The Sweeney »

Here's an idea EON. Spend less on CGI and more on real stunts. Spend less on gimmicks and more on a decent story. Spend less on big names and more on decent, unknown actors. Hell, they could still use tons of unused Fleming material, so they don't really have to spend that much on a scriptwriter either.
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 12983
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

The Sweeney wrote:Hell, they could still use tons of unused Fleming material, so they don't really have to spend that much on a scriptwriter either.
I'd do it for half what Haggis charges.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

The Sweeney wrote:Here's an idea EON. Spend less on CGI and more on real stunts. Spend less on gimmicks and more on a decent story. Spend less on big names and more on decent, unknown actors. Hell, they could still use tons of unused Fleming material, so they don't really have to spend that much on a scriptwriter either.
^This to the zillionth power,especially where the CGI is concerned! :cheers:
User avatar
doubleoLisa
New Recruit
Posts: 23
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:23 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any with Roger Moore
Favorite Movies: Any with Roger Moore ;)

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by doubleoLisa »

200 million is too much to spend on a movie even for Bond. Last time they used CGI to good effect was GoldenEye and that was mostly satellites in spacer cgi and fake satellite images, the other FX was good old fashion model work. Back to basics is the way to go. Hope they can do it.
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

The Sweeney wrote:Here's an idea EON. Spend less on CGI and more on real stunts. Spend less on gimmicks and more on a decent story. Spend less on big names and more on decent, unknown actors. Hell, they could still use tons of unused Fleming material, so they don't really have to spend that much on a scriptwriter either.
Firstly, rid the franchise of CR-egg, then grant your request.
Image
User avatar
Roger Devereau
Lieutenant
Posts: 66
Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 10:52 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Goldfinger
Location: Paris

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Roger Devereau »

Ray Harryhausen is a legend, still working aged 90.

The Sweeney wrote:
Spend less on big names and more on decent, unknown actors.
Quantum of Solace and Casino Royale had no big names and relied on unknown but respected actors who should have been cheap. Did Eon pay big money for many members of the Quantum of Solace cast?
'She looked sharply up at him. 'And who might you be?'

'My name's Bond, James Bond'.
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 12983
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

Roger Devereau wrote: Quantum of Solace and Casino Royale had no big names and relied on unknown but respected actors who should have been cheap. Did Eon pay big money for many members of the Quantum of Solace cast?
I have no idea what they spent the money on. CR in particular had few special effects. I assume the sinking building in Venice was done with miniatures. I guess most of the budget went on the airport chase, but even so, it shouldn't have cost $150 million just for a few trashed vehicles. I'll bet Gerry Anderson could have made CR for a tenth of the budget.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by The Sweeney »

bjmdds wrote:
The Sweeney wrote:Here's an idea EON. Spend less on CGI and more on real stunts. Spend less on gimmicks and more on a decent story. Spend less on big names and more on decent, unknown actors. Hell, they could still use tons of unused Fleming material, so they don't really have to spend that much on a scriptwriter either.
Firstly, rid the franchise of CR-egg, then grant your request.
Image
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

He has more charisma than CR-egg on film.
Image
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Kristatos wrote:
Roger Devereau wrote: Quantum of Solace and Casino Royale had no big names and relied on unknown but respected actors who should have been cheap. Did Eon pay big money for many members of the Quantum of Solace cast?
I have no idea what they spent the money on. CR in particular had few special effects. I assume the sinking building in Venice was done with miniatures. I guess most of the budget went on the airport chase, but even so, it shouldn't have cost $150 million just for a few trashed vehicles. I'll bet Gerry Anderson could have made CR for a tenth of the budget.
Maybe Eon lies on the budget?
Image
Post Reply