James wrote:This looks more & more like Timothy Dalton all over again...
John Drake wrote:Do MGM own any part of the screen rights to Bond themselves?
MGM is dead without Eon anyway.I don't seem them bending over to be helpful in the separation.What does it mean if MGM owns some of the screen rights?James wrote:John Drake wrote:Do MGM own any part of the screen rights to Bond themselves?
I read elsewhere that this might be the case but I'm not completely sure. The Eon/MGM relationship is a knotty one.
katied wrote:What does it mean if MGM owns some of the screen rights?
If MGM owns some of the rights it could get ugly(ala the Kevin McClory situation.)
James wrote:I don't pretend to understand any of this but I did read a post on Cbn where somebody suggested part of the screen rights to Bond were held by MGM which would make a sale even more complicated. Mazer is the expert on studio politics and economics around here so he might be able to throw some light on the truth or otherwise of this.
Captain Nash wrote:I can't wait to see what the good folks here make of this story.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest