
'course,there would be nerdy fans that LOVED it

You know that ain't gonna happen, so why troll on here with a crappy comment like that?katied wrote:I wouldn't put it past Babs to let Bad Porn 'Stache keep it for Bond 23.Another one of her crappy ideas.
'course,there would be nerdy fans that LOVED it
Grow up? Does that apply to those at MI6 as well Sweene? Since when is passion considered a vice? You have it all wrong. The ENTIRE MI6 site is in need of a scolding by you if you really feel that way. Contrary views still affect you and your side after all of this time. Craig is NOT more popular as Bond than Jackman is in Hollywood or on Broadway or on a tiny stage theatre company in Liverpool. Craig has NO following whatsoever. Even the MTV awards shunned himThe Sweeney wrote:I wasn't referring to anything outside of Bond. I was referring to Bond, and Bond alone. Sure, its a Bond franchise, sure it was his first film so curiousity played a factor.bjmdds wrote:Ignorance? I think not. Sweene, you equated a Bond guaranteed success opening due to Craig being the main feature.....WRONG.....Craig was the driver in the Bond franchise car...Jackman is both driver and car...Your all time favorite film Van Helsing, did $300 million worldwide and Wolverine did $363 million worldwide, both Jackman films, both non-Bond. Show me ONE instance OUTSIDE of Bond where Craig as the LEADING man did ANYTHING except crash and burn....just one.....do you know of one?.....Craig is more popular than Jackman in your mind?....on what planet?......you have now entered into the realm of Craig delusion.. Bond 23 might cure you of it.
BUT...I remember you saying CR would flop, despite it being a Bond film. Then, when that was proved wrong, we have to look at the opening weekends globally of QoS to see just what people thought of Craig as Bond. Again, record numbers.
So the argument goes like this.....Craig is more popular than Jackman when comparing his Bond films to Jackman's films....however, outside of Bond, Jackman's films are more popular.
I have no problem with that whatsoever. You two seriously need to grow up....
I think a lot of directors are snobs who consider a Bond film to be beneath them. However, that doesn't always stop them accepting the job, does it Mr. Forster?katied wrote:Here's something I've always wondered: When you hear about a director turning down the offer to film a Bond film, are they doing so because EON's reputation is becoming more well known?
I think a lot of directors are snobs who consider a Bond film to be beneath them. However, that doesn't always stop them accepting the job, does it Mr. Forster?
Care to back this statement up? By how? CR's BO figures? QoS's BO opening weekends worldwide? Do those figures tell you that Craig has NO following whatsoever?bjmdds wrote: Craig is NOT more popular as Bond than Jackman is in Hollywood or on Broadway or on a tiny stage theatre company in Liverpool. Craig has NO following whatsoever.
But you said that Craig would be booted out after CR.bjmdds wrote:When Bond 23 does less box office business than QOS it will be time to jettison the dead weight of Craig.
CB and MI6 have fans, but more fanboys than fans(the most fanboys are at MI6 though).bjmdds wrote:CommanderBond.net and MI6.co.uk have Craig fans
Apart from the obvious ones that everyone says, namely Danny Boyle and Christopher Nolan, I think Kenneth Branagh might be a good choice. He has a flamboyant visual style coupled with a love of good writing (his background is in Shakespeare, after all) that would serve any blockbuster franchise well. Whether he'd be interested is another matter.Captain Nash wrote:
Speaking of directors, who do some of the members here think would make a good Bond director? With or without Craig.
That's exactly who I was referring to with the "fanboy wish list" line.Apart from the obvious ones that everyone says, namely Danny Boyle and Christopher Nolan
Branagh is a good suggestion..but like you say...would he want to do it.I think Kenneth Branagh might be a good choice. He has a flamboyant visual style coupled with a love of good writing (his background is in Shakespeare, after all) that would serve any blockbuster franchise well. Whether he'd be interested is another matter
Has he ever been linked to the directing role? He directed Flash Gordon, Croupier and Get Carter. You could combine those three to make the perfect Bond film!Kristatos:
If we must suffer Craig, Mike Hodges might be a good director for his Bond. His Get Carter is a tough-minded thriller that actually achieves the effect that QOS was striving for, unsuccessfully.
Not that I know of.carl stromberg wrote: Has he ever been linked to the directing role?
James wrote:I suppose they could always telephone John Glen as a last resort.