The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

General Bond discussion from Sean Connery to Pierce Brosnan
Post Reply
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

^Hopefully they won't,but with the Broccowilsons running EON for the forseeable future..... :twisted:
User avatar
John Drake
Commander
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Watching the first twenty James Bond films somewhere...

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by John Drake »

Terry wrote:It would take some feat to make a Bond film worse than QoS but I'm sure Eon will venture forth and give it a good try.
:D
"He is very good-looking" Vesper Lynd
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

The Bond Ultimatum could be a lot worse than The Bourne Mimicry if Craig stays on. :cuss:
Image
User avatar
stockslivevan
SPECTRE 02
Posts: 3249
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:13 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia with Love
Location: Crab Key

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by stockslivevan »

bjmdds wrote:The Bond Ultimatum could be a lot worse than The Bourne Mimicry if Craig stays on. :cuss:
And the fourth film will be even worse and so on and so forth. I'm getting that right am I? :wink:
oscartheman
Agent
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: America

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by oscartheman »

Terry wrote: If you've seen Tomb Raider or Munich it's pretty obvious Craig is a tad ropey when it comes to accents.
ropey nothing.there are times he sounds funny on his own with no accent.
oscartheman
Agent
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue May 15, 2007 3:16 pm
Location: America

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by oscartheman »

stockslivevan wrote:
Terry wrote:It would take some feat to make a Bond film worse than DAD
Quite right.
Lets take a moment to reconsign that Stocks worse dream has come true.
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

Angelina is the one who shouldn't do accents.She always sounds...strange when she does accents.As does Craig.
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

QOS number 22 in USA and done internationally except for Japan. NOT what Eon wanted.
Image
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by The Sweeney »

BJ, what's the current BO figures like now, for worldwide and US? How much behind CR is it now? :?:
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 12982
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

The Sweeney wrote:BJ, what's the current BO figures like now, for worldwide and US? How much behind CR is it now? :?:
About $3 million US and $60 million worldwide, last time I checked.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by The Sweeney »

Kristatos wrote:
The Sweeney wrote:BJ, what's the current BO figures like now, for worldwide and US? How much behind CR is it now? :?:
About $3 million US and $60 million worldwide, last time I checked.
So it looks like it could top CR in the US? Interesting. Looks like you guys have really taken to him, State-side. :shock:

By the end of its run, I wonder how much behind CR it will be worldwide.
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 12982
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

The Sweeney wrote:So it looks like it could top CR in the US?
Nope, its US theatrical run is pretty much over, and worldwide, it only has Japan left to open. It is extremely unlikely to top CR unless it makes twice as much money in Japan as the last couple of Bond films.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
User avatar
stockslivevan
SPECTRE 02
Posts: 3249
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:13 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia with Love
Location: Crab Key

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by stockslivevan »

oscartheman wrote:
stockslivevan wrote:
Terry wrote:It would take some feat to make a Bond film worse than DAD
Quite right.
Lets take a moment to reconsign that Stocks worse dream has come true.
It hasn't.
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

The Sweeney wrote:BJ, what's the current BO figures like now, for worldwide and US? How much behind CR is it now? :?:
Let's figure it out. The budget was $230 million to produce and $170 million to market and advertise worldwide(USA was $50 million supposedly;$120 million internationally). Eon received $75 million approximately for product placement. The NET cost for TBM was roughly $325 million, give or take a million. TO DATE, this Bourne rubbish has taken in $540 million totally, after a huge opening and a swift downward falloff. The studios keep about 50% of the total worldwide take, therefore, TBM, also known as Quantum Of Soul-less, has returned $270 million to Eon's bank account. Do the math, and so far, they are LOSING $55 million to date. Japan awaits, and probably another $15-20 million will be generated, so the total worldwide take will be around $560 million,with $280 million going to Eon, with a net $45 million LOSS. Who spends $325 million to only take back $280 million? Was it arrogance by Eon to presume public stupidity? DVDs will give it revenue, but not what CR did. Eon expected a nice increase to CR's $594 million take, wouldn't you say? That is NOT what they received, and this gives me more than a Quantum Of Solace! :mrgreen: :cheers:
:lol:
Image
User avatar
LilleOSC
Lieutenant
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:52 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Goldfinger
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by LilleOSC »

That's a lot of math and accounting. Are you sure EON will lose money on QOS? That seems hard to believe since Bond films are always profitable.
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by The Sweeney »

bjmdds wrote:
The Sweeney wrote:BJ, what's the current BO figures like now, for worldwide and US? How much behind CR is it now? :?:
Let's figure it out. The budget was $230 million to produce and $170 million to market and advertise worldwide(USA was $50 million supposedly;$120 million internationally). Eon received $75 million approximately for product placement. The NET cost for TBM was roughly $325 million, give or take a million. TO DATE, this Bourne rubbish has taken in $540 million totally, after a huge opening and a swift downward falloff. The studios keep about 50% of the total worldwide take, therefore, TBM, also known as Quantum Of Soul-less, has returned $270 million to Eon's bank account. Do the math, and so far, they are LOSING $55 million to date. Japan awaits, and probably another $15-20 million will be generated, so the total worldwide take will be around $560 million,with $280 million going to Eon, with a net $45 million LOSS. Who spends $325 million to only take back $280 million? Was it arrogance by Eon to presume public stupidity? DVDs will give it revenue, but not what CR did. Eon expected a nice increase to CR's $594 million take, wouldn't you say? That is NOT what they received, and this gives me more than a Quantum Of Solace! :mrgreen: :cheers:
:lol:
Don't forget this was made before the global recession. I wonder if they would spend as much money now, given the fact that Sony has just made mass redundancies.
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Mazer Rackham »

LilleOSC wrote: That seems hard to believe since Bond films are always profitable.
Not always. LTK didn't make its money back after 7 years. Which means after GE revitalised the frachise it still had not broken even.
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Mazer Rackham »

stockslivevan wrote:
oscartheman wrote:Lets take a moment to reconsign that Stocks worse dream has come true.
It hasn't.
Sure it has ;) Worse than that he clapping and applauding it like fool. That has got to be Monty's (pythons) worse dream stuck in his own head eyes glued open clapping like a mad man somehow hearing his own voice say how great one of the worse films ever made in the name of Bond is. :007:
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
User avatar
LilleOSC
Lieutenant
Posts: 136
Joined: Thu Dec 18, 2008 8:52 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Goldfinger
Location: United States
Contact:

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by LilleOSC »

Mazer Rackham wrote:
LilleOSC wrote: That seems hard to believe since Bond films are always profitable.
Not always. LTK didn't make its money back after 7 years. Which means after GE revitalised the frachise it still had not broken even.
Really? I didn't know LTK was so unsuccessful. Is that partly why they waited so long to do GE?
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Mazer Rackham »

LilleOSC wrote:
Mazer Rackham wrote:
LilleOSC wrote: That seems hard to believe since Bond films are always profitable.
Not always. LTK didn't make its money back after 7 years. Which means after GE revitalised the frachise it still had not broken even.
Really? I didn't know LTK was so unsuccessful. Is that partly why they waited so long to do GE?
Maybe. I think the legal battles had more to do with it. Although the investors were not eager about another Dalton film. I think they said the films before LTK broke even and the investors more than anyone wanted a new Bond. If GE had flopped or faltered in some way it would have been the end of the frachise right there.
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
Post Reply