Yeah, I'm sure Babs 'n' Mike hang around this site all the time looking for story ideasMazer Rackham wrote:careful they might nick it. Best of luck trying to collect if they do.

Yeah, I'm sure Babs 'n' Mike hang around this site all the time looking for story ideasMazer Rackham wrote:careful they might nick it. Best of luck trying to collect if they do.
That's top of my list, of things I've asked Santa for!!katied wrote:they would quit very quickly
I suspect that they have thicker skins than that. People in the public eye even those who are only there because of who their father was pretty much have to.katied wrote:If the Broccowilsons read some of the James Board boards(which I doubt they do),they would quit very quickly.
Sure. Do you mean the majority of people who kept asking Craig when Bond will be Bond again. Or the people (some 12 million) who watched CR and will not be watching Quark ?LilleOSC wrote:I want Bond to be more suave in the next film, but I don't think many Casino Royale fans would agree.
Oh wrenchhands, you are so clever and intellectual. Happy now?wrenchhands wrote:Yeah those people who cannot handle change in any way.
No you don't.Change would be for all those things you hate so much being in the next one as well as it being a Bond filmwrenchhands wrote:
I welcome change.
Like "Strawberry Fields" you mean?wrenchhands wrote:I for one say "good riddance!" to (snip) a new throw away girl (with silly name)
Not forgeting the legendary Craig Bond wit, Where is the staionary and the immortaly pithy she is seasick, chuckle,chuckle gerfaw!!!Kristatos wrote:Like "Strawberry Fields" you mean?wrenchhands wrote:I for one say "good riddance!" to (snip) a new throw away girl (with silly name)