The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post Reply
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by The Sweeney »

The Times review - 4/5
http://entertainment.timesonline.co.uk/ ... 965892.ece

James Bond is back, and this time it’s mighty personal. Daniel Craig’s craggy agent picks up exactly where he left off in another bruising thriller that leaves you feeling both drained and exhilarated.

There are hand-to-hand fights that make your eyes water and old-school stunts involving motorbikes, speedboats, jet fighters and expensive cars that give you whiplash just looking at them. Really, nobody does it better than the new 007.

What makes Marc Forster’s film such an intriguing watch is that this is the first of the 22 Bond movies where the plot flows organically from the last instalment, and Quantum of Solace looks a far stronger picture for this rare continuity.

Needless to say the plot is as forbidding as the title. After the death of his girlfriend, Vesper Lynd, at the end of Casino Royale, Bond mixes revenge and duty dangerously as he hunts down the shadowy group that blackmailed Lynd to betray him.

A link to a bank account in Haiti puts Bond on the scent of Mathieu Amalric’s chief creep and ruthless businessman, Dominic Greene. All great Bond adversaries are generously blessed with kinks and quirks and Greene is no different. Amalric has a wonderfully wormy arrogance.

His sidekick, Elvis (Anatole Taubman), sports a monkish fringe, and Tarantino bad looks. But it’s the manner in which Amalric manages to poison all trust in Bond, even from his nearest and dearest, that makes him one of the classic arch-adversaries.

Cold rage threatens to derail Bond’s mission to crack Greene’s dastardly organisation known as Quantum, and I doubt that there’s a better actor at bottling rage than Daniel Craig.

All muscles, he has defined himself as a darker and more bare-knuckle Bond than any of his elegant predecessors.

The deadpan humour is still there. And despite the occasional blasts of visceral and grisly violence, Craig is threatening to become the most popular 007 yet, certainly with the younger generation.

Even the famous Bond babes seem to be getting tougher. Olga Kurylenko’s stunning, hard-as-nails beauty, Camille, has her own private vendetta that she wants to bring to a bloody conclusion, with or without Bond’s help. And Gemma Arterton’s effortlessly foxy Agent Field appeals to the better side of the wounded anti-romantic.

“Do you know how angry I am at myself,” says the naked, raven-haired M16 agent as Bond kisses his way up her spine. But Bond rarely lets a life-threatening difference of opinion get in the way of a decent flirt.

The familiar faces returning from Casino Royale pose a far more subtle, acidic test for Bond who has to tread carefully around treacherous old friends: Jeffrey Wright’s lugubrious CIA agent Felix Leiter; Giancarlo Giannini’s silky string-puller, René Mathis; Jesper Christensen’s duplicitous Mr White; and Judi Dench, of course, as his witheringly unimpressed boss, M.

“When you can’t tell your friends from your enemies it’s time to go,” growls Dench.

Of course, Bond is having none of it. There are new necks to break and toys to play with as the action rips across Austria, Italy, and South America.

The global stakes are as precarious as ever. Amalric’s masterplan to destabilise a South American regime, install a dodgy dictator, General Medrano (Joaquin Cosio), and take control of the biggest source of fresh water in the world is fabulously c**k-eyed. But that’s one of the main reasons why we can’t get enough of the greatest franchise of them all.

The director, Marc Forster, has absorbed the lucrative lessons discovered in Martin Campbell’s Casino Royale. He has also managed to pace his sequel much better. Royale felt slightly wheel-clamped by one too many longeurs. If anything, the crunching chase sequences in Quantum of Solace are even more magnificently dangerous. And the daredevil leaps and tumbles through glass roofs are just as sensational as the splintering high-speed pyrotechnics.

But it’s the amount of heartache and punishment that Craig’s new Bond absorbs that makes him look so right for our times.

Bond is no longer a work in progress. He is now the cruel, finished article.
User avatar
Captain Nash
SPECTRE 01
Posts: 2751
Joined: Thu Feb 22, 2007 2:44 am
Favorite Bond Movie: Octopussy
From Russia With Love
The Living Daylights
On Her Majestys Secret Service
Doctor No
....
Ah heck all of them
Favorite Movies: Lawrence Of Arabia, Forrest Gump, Jaws, The Shawshank Redemption, Vertigo, The Odd Couple, Zoolander, Cool Hand Luke, The Great Escape...many more.
Location: Well here obviously. At the moment of course

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by Captain Nash »

Yet another positive review. And yet again Craig gets the lions share of the praise. Must be onto something there.
Great read.
User avatar
carl stromberg
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence
Posts: 4495
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:15 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: The Spy Who Loved Me
Favorite Movies: Amicus compendium horror films
It's a Gift
A Night At The Opera
The Return of the Pink Panther
Sons of the Desert
Location: The Duck Inn

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by carl stromberg »

The forum is seeing the pro-Cragers equivalent of the Ardennes offensive this morning. :wink:
Bring back Bond!
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by The Sweeney »

Just trying to redress the balance here slightly.... :wink:

The reviews still baffle me though, when it seems QOS is either one mess of a film, or the best Bond film ever. I can understand complaints of not having enough comedy, gadgets, etc. but for the film to be boring, when we know for a fact there is probably more action in this than most other movies. How can critics be so heavily divided on this? Have they all seen the same film?? :?
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 13023
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by Kristatos »

The Sweeney wrote:The reviews still baffle me though, when it seems QOS is either one mess of a film, or the best Bond film ever. I can understand complaints of not having enough comedy, gadgets, etc. but for the film to be boring, when we know for a fact there is probably more action in this than most other movies. How can critics be so heavily divided on this? Have they all seen the same film?? :?
They were divided on FYEO too. As for your point about how it can be boring, I've seen films that were non-stop action that bored me silly, because I didn't care. Mark Kermode seems to think QOS falls into this category, obviously I won't know whether I agree with him until I see it, but his comments put me in mind of overblown messes like Cutthroat Island and the third act of The Phantom Menace where every frame was filled with bits of business, but I was looking at my watch anyway, because it was all just "a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, but signifying nothing".
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by Mazer Rackham »

The Sweeney wrote:Just trying to redress the balance here slightly.... :wink:

The reviews still baffle me though, when it seems QOS is either one mess of a film, or the best Bond film ever. I can understand complaints of not having enough comedy, gadgets, etc. but for the film to be boring, when we know for a fact there is probably more action in this than most other movies. How can critics be so heavily divided on this? Have they all seen the same film?? :?
the best Bond film ever & best Bond ever are used flippantly every new release.
Bad movies get good reviews for various reasons. Some reviews I suspect are written before the movie is screened. Laziness on the part of entertainment reporters is epic, some of the sluggards, in private and off the record will accept pre-written stuff.
Thankfully Movies are not like the video game industry where good reviews decide where the advertising dollars are spent. People have been fired for giving a bad game a bad reviews becasue the main advertising dollars came from the game developer.
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by Mazer Rackham »

carl stromberg wrote:The forum is seeing the pro-Cragers equivalent of the Ardennes offensive this morning. :wink:
Sony defense force more like ;)
Quark is already getting bad word of mouth, that is more damning than 100% bad reviews. If a strong undercurrent starts that this is the Quantum of Suck the BO Sony needs so badly this year will vanish.



In my estimation most of the pro-Craigers are cautiously optimistic.
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by The Sweeney »

Mazer Rackham wrote:In my estimation most of the pro-Craigers are cautiously optimistic.
I'll agree with that. To be honest, I wasn't totally optimistic before going to see CR. Now with the release of QOS, it kind of feels like deja vu all over again.
katied

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by katied »

Mazer Rackham wrote:
carl stromberg wrote:The forum is seeing the pro-Cragers equivalent of the Ardennes offensive this morning. :wink:
Sony defense force more like ;)
Quark is already getting bad word of mouth, that is more damning than 100% bad reviews. If a strong undercurrent starts that this is the Quantum of Suck the BO Sony needs so badly this year will vanish.



In my estimation most of the pro-Craigers are cautiously optimistic.
Hate to disagree but.....The vast majority of the pro-Craigs here sound like pro-Sony/Bond/EON shills, :?
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by The Sweeney »

Kristatos wrote:
The Sweeney wrote:The reviews still baffle me though, when it seems QOS is either one mess of a film, or the best Bond film ever. I can understand complaints of not having enough comedy, gadgets, etc. but for the film to be boring, when we know for a fact there is probably more action in this than most other movies. How can critics be so heavily divided on this? Have they all seen the same film?? :?
They were divided on FYEO too. As for your point about how it can be boring, I've seen films that were non-stop action that bored me silly, because I didn't care. Mark Kermode seems to think QOS falls into this category, obviously I won't know whether I agree with him until I see it, but his comments put me in mind of overblown messes like Cutthroat Island and the third act of The Phantom Menace where every frame was filled with bits of business, but I was looking at my watch anyway, because it was all just "a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, but signifying nothing".
If the action is silly, OTT nonsense like I suffered during the Brozza years, I will be looking at my watch too. I can't think of anything worse.

If however, the action is gritty, realistic, hard-hitting, then I'll probably be ok with it.
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by Mazer Rackham »

The Sweeney wrote:
If the action is silly, OTT nonsense like I suffered during the Brozza years, I will be looking at my watch too. I can't think of anything worse.

If however, the action is gritty, realistic, hard-hitting, then I'll probably be ok with it.
You may be out of luck Sween. A person whose opinion I trust absolutely was at the US screener and told me they really F-ed it up bad this time.
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
katied

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by katied »

You may be out of luck Sween. A person whose opinion I trust absolutely was at the US screener and told me they really F-ed it up bad this time.
That's not good. :shock:
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by The Sweeney »

Mazer Rackham wrote:
The Sweeney wrote:
If the action is silly, OTT nonsense like I suffered during the Brozza years, I will be looking at my watch too. I can't think of anything worse.

If however, the action is gritty, realistic, hard-hitting, then I'll probably be ok with it.
You may be out of luck Sween. A person whose opinion I trust absolutely was at the US screener and told me they really F-ed it up bad this time.


I really hope not..... :(
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Re: The Times Review - latest film has it all

Post by Mazer Rackham »

The Sweeney wrote:
Mazer Rackham wrote:
The Sweeney wrote:
If the action is silly, OTT nonsense like I suffered during the Brozza years, I will be looking at my watch too. I can't think of anything worse.

If however, the action is gritty, realistic, hard-hitting, then I'll probably be ok with it.
You may be out of luck Sween. A person whose opinion I trust absolutely was at the US screener and told me they really F-ed it up bad this time.


I really hope not..... :(
It might not be that bad Sween. You might find it to be better. Me I'm just about assured on what I'll find.
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
Post Reply