Omega wrote:Didn’t they get the last two elections wrong. I’m thinking they were the ones saying 86% chance of Clinton
Yes, he's the head honcho, though it's not a one-man show.Omega wrote:Isn’t 538 Nate silver?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Yeah, he is only as good as his data. Nobody gets it right all the time, but he has a better track record than most.Omega wrote:He was dead on for Obama election but hasn’t been right since trump. Got the special elections wrong, and ironically silver is out there with the same odds on the house race he gave Hillary.
But I get metrics are metrics are metrics. Well see how good they are today.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I think there going to be a few regional matches that fall blue, but on a whole when the senate went out of play so did the house seats in those areas.Kristatos wrote:It's not looking like a wave election to me.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Big O, the media and the left-wing Democrats are clinically insaneOmega wrote:Biggest thing I noticed was the candidates trump was pushing are standard cookie cutter party guys with no charisma, they look the part and talk the part but the audience went dead when trump yielded the floor to them. These relentless attack on trump even though he is the most powerful man on earth has let he keep playing David to the establishments Goliath.
I truly thought by this time the Democrats and media would finally figure out how trump does it, he’s a better communicator and reads his audience with a instinct about where to take his policies. Easily got to be a few dozen Democrats who could do the same thing but I believe the parties are in lockdown afraid if they follow trump they get cut off for a few election cycles when normality returns. They have yet to think what if their normality is gone?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests