Classic Bond Forum

I know this sounds pretty stupid, but I thought I would bring this up since one of the Pro-Craigs from imdb said that he would rather want Seagal to play Bond than Pierce.

I'd like to be the first to congratulate Steve on his Knighthood. That must have been a memorable day at the Palace.

Was Seagal Knighted?

FormerBondFan wrote:Was Seagal Knighted?

You're the one that put "sir" in your subject line.

Well he did break Sean Connery's wrist during the filming of NSNA. Though I don't think that gets one knighted.
Judging from his nicknames calling himself "Sir" is not beyond him.

"I was born very different, clairvoyant and a healer"-Steven Seagal

Nicknames:
The Great One
Lord Steven
The Master of Aikido

Blowfeld wrote:Nicknames:
The Great One
Lord Steven
The Master of Aikido

I hear he was going to declare himself King of Scotland, but Idi Amin beat him to it.

This forum is like being in a Will Hay film sometimes.

Seagal's Bond armed with licence to kill.

Seagal is starting to look more and more like the guy him did a MADTV impersonation of him






how can anyone take Seagal seriously or have the gall to suggest his name in the same breath as with bond?

The guy was bad cliche action star in the early 80s and went down hill fast. Chuck Noris and Jackie Chan have more acting skill than Seagal.

I did like Under Siege but most of his work is a bad B moive spy stuff. Secret CIA killer who just wants to retire... In a world where the bag guys will not leave him alone

The name's Bond......James Bond.

FormerBondFan wrote:

Seagal's Bond armed with licence to kill.

"That's our Bond!"

Vodka martini......shaken not stirred.

FormerBondFan wrote:

I know this sounds pretty stupid, I would rather want Seagal to play Bond than Pierce.

Fbf, I'm surprised at you. Though I don't agree on your choice.
Neither would be my pick.

Seagal=bloated James Bond

I guess if it had of happened. Surely we would all of agreed that Segal would be one of the worst choices.
One of those, we all agree type things?

Seagal hasn't aged well.That's being kind

Thankfully he hasn't been heard of for a while.
That's being nasty.

Look as if he gave up on the Steven Seagal fame train and is attempting to corner the Tom Baker lookalike market.

Captain Nash wrote:I guess if it had of happened. Surely we would all of agreed that Segal would be one of the worst choices.
One of those, we all agree type things?

Very disquieting. Since it is you saying that, my first reaction is to defend Steven. Something along the lines of 'Seagal's edgy, wolfish common touch should be fine in the "Casino Royale" remake.'

Captain Nash wrote:

FormerBondFan wrote:

I know this sounds pretty stupid, I would rather want Seagal to play Bond than Pierce.

Fbf, I'm surprised at you. Though I don't agree on your choice.
Neither would be my pick.

I'm just making a fun of Seagal since his movies are laughable these days..

And actually it was a Pro-Craig from imdb who said he wanted Seagal to play Bond instead of Pierce.

Blowfeld wrote:Very disquieting. Since it is you saying that, my first reaction is to defend Steven. Something along the lines of 'Seagal's edgy, wolfish common touch should be fine in the "Casino Royale" remake.'

That's a bit petty, innit?