bjmdds wrote:Dear Mick LaSalle: I find Daniel Craig too thuggish a Bond for my tastes. He lacks suaveness and the epicurean’s delight in sensual pleasure that Sean Connery created with a twinkle in his eye. Craig’s eyes are steely, and when he wears a tux, he looks like a bulldog with a chain around its neck. There’s no whimsical mischief — he’s a gloomy Bond.
Neil Silverman, San Jose
Dear Neil Silverman: Interesting. Your description of Craig is largely accurate (except for the part about his lacking mischief), but a lot of what you see as flaws, I like. Craig’s blue-eyed stare is one of the coldest in the world, second only to Vladimir Putin’s, and he does look like a bulldog in a tuxedo, but to me that harks back to Sean Connery.
Mr. LaSalle is demonstrating the definition of the "Bond fan who doesn't like Bond". "I like Criag because he is everything Bond isn't". "All those things that encapsulate Bond, Craig has none and comes off as a thug, PERFECT!" Its perfectly fine not to like Bond, but to say a man who embodies none of what the character was constructed to radiate is a "great Bond" is delusional! For instance, Vladimir Putin should never be uttered in a Bond description!
As to Connery, who wore nothing but bespoke clothing in his Bond tenure as invoking the same "bulldog look" as Craig, I thing Mr. LaSalle has been watching the wrong movies, or has no clue about men's clothing, or both!