
bjmdds wrote:This exploration into the psyche of superheroes has become a joke. I hope they don't go down that path with The Man Of Steel. I want action, escapism, saving the world from lunatics and villains, not seeing why a hero is who they are, nor any Mommy Dearest Bond films like Skyfall.

bjmdds wrote:Jack........YOU.......are "my kind of people"![]()

bjmdds wrote:Jack........YOU.......are "my kind of people"![]()

kater23 wrote:bjmdds wrote:Jack........YOU.......are "my kind of people"![]()
I second the sentiment..JackJamesBond, you're definitely going to fit in here.

The Sweeney wrote:Daltonite Toothpaste wrote:The Sweeney wrote:JackJamesBond007 wrote:Daniel Craig is James Bond, huh? Even my grandmother does a better act and she's asleep than Craig when he's doing his best. Best? He's nothing more than the worst.
Maybe so in yor opinion, but he has just starred in the most successful Bond film of all time.
It's difficult to dispute that fact.
That doesn't equal quality.
Bagging a lot of global awards, getting into the 90's on RT, global critical accliam, and the 7th biggest BO film of all time, its not a bad benchmark to go by....
Daltonite Toothpaste wrote:The Sweeney wrote:Daltonite Toothpaste wrote:The Sweeney wrote:JackJamesBond007 wrote:Daniel Craig is James Bond, huh? Even my grandmother does a better act and she's asleep than Craig when he's doing his best. Best? He's nothing more than the worst.
Maybe so in yor opinion, but he has just starred in the most successful Bond film of all time.
It's difficult to dispute that fact.
That doesn't equal quality.
Bagging a lot of global awards, getting into the 90's on RT, global critical accliam, and the 7th biggest BO film of all time, its not a bad benchmark to go by....
I'd rather use the benchmark of whether I liked the film, not whether a lot of other people liked it.

JackJamesBond007 wrote:Well, here's something. Sam Mendes turned down the B24 whelming. I hope they literally fire Daniel Craig and Babs loses her part as a producer!!! MGM really ballsed it up within two decades, it's time to sell the rights to Warner Brothers, at least they still make old school action movies. And as well, the style of the films should revert back to the GE/TND formula with either Clive Owen or Michael Fassbender in the role of James Bond, a CLASSIC James Bond with manly persona like he was used to be from 1962 to 2004 (discounting DAD). I've had enough with an emotional cowardly liar and incompetent Bas***d taking the role of 007 and ruining the reputation of the franchise. It's time for Bond to be literally BOND again, the Sean Connery Bond that started in 1962 and ended with Brosnan. Gosh, I miss the old days. Yes, I know I may be too young to prefer old school, but that is how my father, a former Sgt. Major, brought me up. I prefer to be MANLY instead of being an emotionally unbalanced twerp like the modern protagonists in the films are, such as Twilight, Jason Bourne (discounting the literary original trilogy), and Christopher Nolan's pathetic Dark Knight. FULL STOP!

Chief of Staff, 007's gone round the bend. Says someone's been trying to feed him a poisoned banana. Fellow's lost his nerve. Been in the hospital too long. Better call him home.
Dr. No wrote:JackJamesBond007 wrote:Well, here's something. Sam Mendes turned down the B24 whelming. I hope they literally fire Daniel Craig and Babs loses her part as a producer!!! MGM really ballsed it up within two decades, it's time to sell the rights to Warner Brothers, at least they still make old school action movies. And as well, the style of the films should revert back to the GE/TND formula with either Clive Owen or Michael Fassbender in the role of James Bond, a CLASSIC James Bond with manly persona like he was used to be from 1962 to 2004 (discounting DAD). I've had enough with an emotional cowardly liar and incompetent Bas***d taking the role of 007 and ruining the reputation of the franchise. It's time for Bond to be literally BOND again, the Sean Connery Bond that started in 1962 and ended with Brosnan. Gosh, I miss the old days. Yes, I know I may be too young to prefer old school, but that is how my father, a former Sgt. Major, brought me up. I prefer to be MANLY instead of being an emotionally unbalanced twerp like the modern protagonists in the films are, such as Twilight, Jason Bourne (discounting the literary original trilogy), and Christopher Nolan's pathetic Dark Knight. FULL STOP!
Well at this point 10 years ago everybody expected Pierce to make his fifth, it was promised by EON, yet they took so long they successfully fired a good Bond adn hired a guy wiht relatively no on screen magnetism. Craig is good at playing a psychopath but that is not what and who James Bond is. Other movie series have adopted some of the Bondishness and Bond adopts more of the other movies persona and probably will continue to as long as Craig has the job.


The Saint 007 wrote:Dr. No wrote:JackJamesBond007 wrote:Well, here's something. Sam Mendes turned down the B24 whelming. I hope they literally fire Daniel Craig and Babs loses her part as a producer!!! MGM really ballsed it up within two decades, it's time to sell the rights to Warner Brothers, at least they still make old school action movies. And as well, the style of the films should revert back to the GE/TND formula with either Clive Owen or Michael Fassbender in the role of James Bond, a CLASSIC James Bond with manly persona like he was used to be from 1962 to 2004 (discounting DAD). I've had enough with an emotional cowardly liar and incompetent Bas***d taking the role of 007 and ruining the reputation of the franchise. It's time for Bond to be literally BOND again, the Sean Connery Bond that started in 1962 and ended with Brosnan. Gosh, I miss the old days. Yes, I know I may be too young to prefer old school, but that is how my father, a former Sgt. Major, brought me up. I prefer to be MANLY instead of being an emotionally unbalanced twerp like the modern protagonists in the films are, such as Twilight, Jason Bourne (discounting the literary original trilogy), and Christopher Nolan's pathetic Dark Knight. FULL STOP!
Well at this point 10 years ago everybody expected Pierce to make his fifth, it was promised by EON, yet they took so long they successfully fired a good Bond adn hired a guy wiht relatively no on screen magnetism. Craig is good at playing a psychopath but that is not what and who James Bond is. Other movie series have adopted some of the Bondishness and Bond adopts more of the other movies persona and probably will continue to as long as Craig has the job.
Fans have suggested that EA Games gave Brosnan his fifth Bond outing with Everything Or Nothing. It's a great game, and it would have certainly made for a decent Bond film adventure with a little work.


Omega wrote:I read Babs was asked why Every thing or nothing was not made in to a movie her response was that was Pierce's Bond and we make Craig films now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

Omega wrote:I read Babs was asked why Every thing or nothing was not made in to a movie her response was that was Pierce's Bond and we make Craig films now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2

The Saint 007 wrote:Omega wrote:I read Babs was asked why Every thing or nothing was not made in to a movie her response was that was Pierce's Bond and we make Craig films now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Just like the "There's only one James Bond, and he's currently being portrayed by Daniel Craig" response to why Brosnan wasn't included in the GoldenEye remake. It's bad enough I no longer enjoy the Bond films, but they go and ruin the Bond games with mimicking Call Of Duty and all.

JackJamesBond007 wrote:The Saint 007 wrote:Omega wrote:I read Babs was asked why Every thing or nothing was not made in to a movie her response was that was Pierce's Bond and we make Craig films now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Just like the "There's only one James Bond, and he's currently being portrayed by Daniel Craig" response to why Brosnan wasn't included in the GoldenEye remake. It's bad enough I no longer enjoy the Bond films, but they go and ruin the Bond games with mimicking Call Of Duty and all.
Why play a rubbish remake when you have the decent original?

The Saint 007 wrote:JackJamesBond007 wrote:The Saint 007 wrote:Omega wrote:I read Babs was asked why Every thing or nothing was not made in to a movie her response was that was Pierce's Bond and we make Craig films now.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Just like the "There's only one James Bond, and he's currently being portrayed by Daniel Craig" response to why Brosnan wasn't included in the GoldenEye remake. It's bad enough I no longer enjoy the Bond films, but they go and ruin the Bond games with mimicking Call Of Duty and all.
Why play a rubbish remake when you have the decent original?
It would have been nice if they had taken the original game and simply updated the graphics, gameplay, added online play, AI Bots, etc. But along with the original, there's always the GoldenEye Source version of the game to play. Even though the Source version is currently just a multiplayer game, it's still much more fun than Activision's remake.

JackJamesBond007 wrote:Activision under Bobby Kotick really became more greedy and disgusting. They took the 007 license and turned every title they made to rubbish COD, yet they criticized GERA. At least, EA tried to come up with something new, unlike Activision whom I call them after Bobby Kotick got his hands to it, Craptivision. I mean come on, ever played Soldier of Fortune and Soldier of Fortune II? they were literally great first person shooters by Activision, but since COD arrived, they ruined everything.

Return to Daniel Craig as James Bond
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests