I don't know nearly $25 million unless it sells big time on DVD & vod I'm not sure.bjmdds wrote:Big O, do you anticipate Brosnan returning in a sequel to NM?
I think this may be up to Europe to decide.
Bad luck its a bad year for movies.
I don't know nearly $25 million unless it sells big time on DVD & vod I'm not sure.bjmdds wrote:Big O, do you anticipate Brosnan returning in a sequel to NM?
I know what he meant, he would use Rogers name if it were 1983. However I would like to know one thing Broccoli family or Daniel have done to contribute to British culture.(Slightly off-topic but talking about Sherlock, Moffat said he didn’t have too many jitters about reintroducing a beloved character in such a modern way, but there was a moment when his new version of Doctor Who was about to come out in the same few months as Sherlock and he thought, “If I screw both these up, all I have to do is shoot Daniel Craig in the face and I’ve screwed British culture.”)
It does seem based on the fallacious idea that Craig is irreplaceable, though.Blowfeld wrote:
I know what he meant, he would use Rogers name if it were 1983. However I would like to know one thing Broccoli family or Daniel have done to contribute to British culture.
Make Bond films that were critically and financially successful? I know many aren't fond for those Craig Bond films, but it would be silly to dismiss their impact as much as it would have been silly in the 1970s for Connery fans to dismiss Roger Moore's run.Blowfeld wrote:Steve Moffat mentioned our favourite thespian.I know what he meant, he would use Rogers name if it were 1983. However I would like to know one thing Broccoli family or Daniel have done to contribute to British culture.(Slightly off-topic but talking about Sherlock, Moffat said he didn’t have too many jitters about reintroducing a beloved character in such a modern way, but there was a moment when his new version of Doctor Who was about to come out in the same few months as Sherlock and he thought, “If I screw both these up, all I have to do is shoot Daniel Craig in the face and I’ve screwed British culture.”)
I'm not dismissing them. I'm thinking of impact on the culture. I don't think the Broccoli family or Daniel, Roger, Pierce, Timothy, or George have impacted the culture. I might argue about Sean, however I'm taking what Moffat said slightly too far. I take his meaning, he has two arguably cultural icons if he ruined them all that's left from a visual medium point of view is Harry Potter and 007 James Bond.stockslivevan wrote:Make Bond films that were critically and financially successful? I know many aren't fond for those Craig Bond films, but it would be silly to dismiss their impact as much as it would have been silly in the 1970s for Connery fans to dismiss Roger Moore's run.Blowfeld wrote:Steve Moffat mentioned our favourite thespian.I know what he meant, he would use Rogers name if it were 1983. However I would like to know one thing Broccoli family or Daniel have done to contribute to British culture.(Slightly off-topic but talking about Sherlock, Moffat said he didn’t have too many jitters about reintroducing a beloved character in such a modern way, but there was a moment when his new version of Doctor Who was about to come out in the same few months as Sherlock and he thought, “If I screw both these up, all I have to do is shoot Daniel Craig in the face and I’ve screwed British culture.”)
ugh I tried watching the first series with Christopher again recently only to give up. Not as good as I remember and to begin with I didn't like his Doctor until the last few shows. Looking back it is a minor miracle the series was picked up.stockslivevan wrote:He's likely talking about today's culture, as opposed to the grand scheme of things. All three incarnations are very popular at this time, something I'm sure most of Britain is proud of.
Outside of the UK, Dr. Who has grown very popular here in the states to the point that I gave it a shot. I don't get the appeal, but then again I tried starting with the revival with Christopher Eccleston. One day I might give the first series a shot.
Yepbjmdds wrote:November Man came and went quietly in the USA. We will see November 7th how our UK members receive it.
Nah. I'm not done with the franchise, Daniel Craig is done at this point, like everyone else was before him. So I'll be here for the next one. I am and at what Craig said RE: Rihanna. I guess when one is left at home while wife is busy seeking better companions, vulgarity is what always wins. And Rihanna certainly is the epitome of it.bjmdds wrote:Wait one minute Ale YOU are done with Bond too? Have you finally thrown in the towel on Broccoli's ruination of her daddy's masterpiece? Many here have given up on this corrupt tangential Bond interpretation but I always thought you had hope So, the green vegetable has accomplished her goal. TO HELL WITH BOND should be the title of Bond 24 and I am sure FBF will agree most definitely. Rihanna? YIKES, BUT, she deserves Cr-egg and he deserves her, if true, and Cr-egg's Bond can play with MP and Rihanna all he likes in this next farce of a Bond film.........."She didn't even need to think about it, she knows she wants to do it. She's really excited." The pop star will certainly have got Daniel Craig's seal of approval after he previously said Rihanna would be his dream Bond girl. The 46-year-old actor - who has played James Bond since 2006's 'Casino Royale' - admitted he chose the beauty over Beyonce, because Rihanna is "dirtier". His comment prompted the 26-year-old to say: "This makes me happy".Alessandra wrote:Good Lord.James wrote:Dunno if this has been posted yet. Daniel Craig scouting locations for Bond 24.
http://badassdigest.com/2014/09/29/this ... -you-wood/
He looks like UTTER CR*P in every way.
I can't look at this Putin lookalike and think he is James Bond. SMFH. I will take Idris Elba over him ANY given day, even if I don't think Elba is the perfect choice. If they wanted a black man to play Bond, it should have been Denzel Washington a long time ago.
Now instead, straight from the book of horrors, yesterday I was reading speculation that RIHANNA COULD BE THE NEXT BOND GIRL
RIHANNA?!??!?!? THE EPITOME OF VULGARITY?!?!?
ARE YOU KIDDING ME NOW!
I am FAR better suited to be a Bond girl than her even if I don't have a model's physique (just for height, not for being slim and built). SMH. I am DONE with these clowns!