Harry Hamlin with an aged Ursula Andress and Burgess Meredith was lacking.katied wrote:Eh, even with CGI Clash of The Titans looks cheesy(makes me want to watch the original which wasn't much better).
The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
- bjmdds
- 001
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
bjmdds wrote:Harry Hamlin with an aged Ursula Andress and Burgess Meredith was lacking.katied wrote:Eh, even with CGI Clash of The Titans looks cheesy(makes me want to watch the original which wasn't much better).
Oh yeah..but it is preferable to the remake which looks dreadful

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
I kinda want to Netflix the original Clash Of The Titans before I see the new one.
- bjmdds
- 001
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
Go ahead. I saw it many times. It was not a hit when released. Hercules with Steve Reeves was much better type of film, yet many years earlier.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
The difference is that in the original, the cheesiness is part of the charm. Harryhausen's stop-motion animation is not as slick as CGI, but...one guy did all that! I find it hard to whip up as much appreciation for a team of computer programmers as for a single craftsman like Ray Harryhausen, however much shinier the fruits of the geeks' labours are.katied wrote:Eh, even with CGI Clash of The Titans looks cheesy(makes me want to watch the original which wasn't much better).
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
- Mazer Rackham
- Q
- Posts: 1569
- Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love - Location: Eros
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
Freida Pinto & Olivia Wilde have not been signed and neither of them were considering accepting a Bond role. When the tabloid rumors like this sprout up I always want to ask them "with what money?"
Although Olivia Wilde would have been a much better Vesper, shame they went for the odd (old) school teacher and his coworker/lover on vacation look for the romantic couple in CR.
Bond is stuck as long as MGM is stuck. No casting, no hiring a director, no nothing before the funds are freed up. WB put best bid in last week, but was well under what the creditors want. It is a big mess that looks like it will drag on for awhile longer.
Although Olivia Wilde would have been a much better Vesper, shame they went for the odd (old) school teacher and his coworker/lover on vacation look for the romantic couple in CR.
Bond is stuck as long as MGM is stuck. No casting, no hiring a director, no nothing before the funds are freed up. WB put best bid in last week, but was well under what the creditors want. It is a big mess that looks like it will drag on for awhile longer.
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
Exactly.. If they are forced to scrape the bottom of the barrel for budget reasons, who knows what we'll get,Bond girl wise!Mazer Rackham wrote:Freida Pinto & Olivia Wilde have not been signed and neither of them were considering accepting a Bond role. When the tabloid rumors like this sprout up I always want to ask them "with what money?"

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
Is Bond 23 likely to be a low-budget affair, though? Hollywood has never been afraid to throw money after money, and the franchise's history shows that lower-budget Bond films tend to do less well at the box office.katied wrote: Exactly.. If they are forced to scrape the bottom of the barrel for budget reasons, who knows what we'll get,Bond girl wise!
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
I don't think they could afford name actresses-like Pinto and Wilde. They would be too expensive, even without money constraints.
- The Sweeney
- 003
- Posts: 3389
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
- Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
- Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
Here's an idea EON. Spend less on CGI and more on real stunts. Spend less on gimmicks and more on a decent story. Spend less on big names and more on decent, unknown actors. Hell, they could still use tons of unused Fleming material, so they don't really have to spend that much on a scriptwriter either.
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
I'd do it for half what Haggis charges.The Sweeney wrote:Hell, they could still use tons of unused Fleming material, so they don't really have to spend that much on a scriptwriter either.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
^This to the zillionth power,especially where the CGI is concerned!The Sweeney wrote:Here's an idea EON. Spend less on CGI and more on real stunts. Spend less on gimmicks and more on a decent story. Spend less on big names and more on decent, unknown actors. Hell, they could still use tons of unused Fleming material, so they don't really have to spend that much on a scriptwriter either.

- doubleoLisa
- New Recruit
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 5:23 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: Any with Roger Moore
- Favorite Movies: Any with Roger Moore ;)
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
200 million is too much to spend on a movie even for Bond. Last time they used CGI to good effect was GoldenEye and that was mostly satellites in spacer cgi and fake satellite images, the other FX was good old fashion model work. Back to basics is the way to go. Hope they can do it.
- bjmdds
- 001
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
Firstly, rid the franchise of CR-egg, then grant your request.The Sweeney wrote:Here's an idea EON. Spend less on CGI and more on real stunts. Spend less on gimmicks and more on a decent story. Spend less on big names and more on decent, unknown actors. Hell, they could still use tons of unused Fleming material, so they don't really have to spend that much on a scriptwriter either.

- Roger Devereau
- Lieutenant
- Posts: 66
- Joined: Fri Nov 28, 2008 10:52 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: Goldfinger
- Location: Paris
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
Ray Harryhausen is a legend, still working aged 90.
Quantum of Solace and Casino Royale had no big names and relied on unknown but respected actors who should have been cheap. Did Eon pay big money for many members of the Quantum of Solace cast?The Sweeney wrote:
Spend less on big names and more on decent, unknown actors.
'She looked sharply up at him. 'And who might you be?'
'My name's Bond, James Bond'.
'My name's Bond, James Bond'.
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
I have no idea what they spent the money on. CR in particular had few special effects. I assume the sinking building in Venice was done with miniatures. I guess most of the budget went on the airport chase, but even so, it shouldn't have cost $150 million just for a few trashed vehicles. I'll bet Gerry Anderson could have made CR for a tenth of the budget.Roger Devereau wrote: Quantum of Solace and Casino Royale had no big names and relied on unknown but respected actors who should have been cheap. Did Eon pay big money for many members of the Quantum of Solace cast?
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
- The Sweeney
- 003
- Posts: 3389
- Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
- Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
- Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
bjmdds wrote:Firstly, rid the franchise of CR-egg, then grant your request.The Sweeney wrote:Here's an idea EON. Spend less on CGI and more on real stunts. Spend less on gimmicks and more on a decent story. Spend less on big names and more on decent, unknown actors. Hell, they could still use tons of unused Fleming material, so they don't really have to spend that much on a scriptwriter either.

- bjmdds
- 001
- Posts: 14814
- Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
- Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.
Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......
Maybe Eon lies on the budget?Kristatos wrote:I have no idea what they spent the money on. CR in particular had few special effects. I assume the sinking building in Venice was done with miniatures. I guess most of the budget went on the airport chase, but even so, it shouldn't have cost $150 million just for a few trashed vehicles. I'll bet Gerry Anderson could have made CR for a tenth of the budget.Roger Devereau wrote: Quantum of Solace and Casino Royale had no big names and relied on unknown but respected actors who should have been cheap. Did Eon pay big money for many members of the Quantum of Solace cast?
