The same plots(Bond goes rogue after M gets kidnapped) have started to come up in conversation at the usual places again. The "going rogue" thing is a bit overdone, no?
stockslivevan wrote:I hope not. We've already had Bond "go rogue" in TWINE, DAD, CR, and QOS all in a row.
Its about what Cubby's kids are left with. And we all know "rogue" is "hip", all those brooding kids with their baggy pants and Walkmans all think going rogue is off the "off the hook"
stockslivevan wrote:I hope not. We've already had Bond "go rogue" in TWINE, DAD, CR, and QOS all in a row.
Its about what Cubby's kids are left with. And we all know "rogue" is "hip", all those brooding kids with their baggy pants and Walkmans all think going rogue is off the "off the hook"
I'm hip. I'm with it. Duka duka duka duka"
Exactly.Let's not dance around it. Rogue is overdone.As is suggesting bringing back Blofeld.
Mazer Rackham wrote:And we all know "rogue" is "hip", all those brooding kids with their baggy pants and Walkmans all think going rogue is off the "off the hook"
It's actually what's taught in film schools. I went to a screenwriting seminar once where we were told that the protagonist of your movie should be somehow "outside the system" and that audiences wouldn't identify with a hero who was an agent of the establishment. That was about the time (mid-'90s) that Bond suddenly became yet another cop on the edge, continually having to justify his crazy antics to the commissioner, so to speak.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
Kristatos wrote:That was about the time (mid-'90s) that Bond suddenly became yet another cop on the edge, continually having to justify his crazy antics to the commissioner, so to speak.
To be fair Bond had always been as such. Look back as far as Goldfinger when he gets berated by M for fooling around with Goldfinger's girl instead of investigating the man himself. And in TLD where he's supposed to assassinate Pushkin but his instincts tell him something's up. Stuff like that is fine once in awhile. But having four straight films of "rogue Bond" is pushing it. Of course Bond turns out to have been right all along in the end of each flick, but it wouldn't have hurt to inform his superiors of what he's onto. Heck even in QOS M expresses that she trusts Bond's judgments.
stockslivevan wrote:
To be fair Bond had always been as such. Look back as far as Goldfinger when he gets berated by M for fooling around with Goldfinger's girl instead of investigating the man himself. And in TLD where he's supposed to assassinate Pushkin but his instincts tell him something's up. Stuff like that is fine once in awhile. But having four straight films of "rogue Bond" is pushing it. Of course Bond turns out to have been right all along in the end of each flick, but it wouldn't have hurt to inform his superiors of what he's onto. Heck even in QOS M expresses that she trusts Bond's judgments.
I think it became more pronounced in the Brosnan and Craig eras, though, probably due to a perceived need to make him more of an outsider.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
That was the point I made Kris. With the arc finished off in QOS, I hope Bond 23 will be standard spy fare but with the best to offer. Craig's on the mark that it should go for a lighter tone, as he remarked about how he wants the next one to have Bond sitting on the beach with a martini for about an hour of the flick.
Let's just make it clear. Blofeld returning has been rumored for every Bond film that has been made since god knows when. It happened with CR, it happened with QOS, and it's now happening with Bond 23. But will Blofeld really return in a future Bond film? At the moment, NO. The legal wranglings are to messed up to even bring it up. Cubby dumped Blofeld in the chimney almost 30 years ago so there's no going back.
I'm just ranting right now because I hate talking about Blofeld rumors, it's pointless. Nothing will come out of them. There gotta be far more interesting rumors than that dead horse.
Moneypenny, for example. Should she be "introduced" or should they present her as if her and Bond already knew eachother (ala Lois Maxwell's backstory).
If Q ever returns, I'd prefer he'd be referred to as Major Boothroyd. Should be played like the Peter Burton version in Dr. No. None of that "OH GROW UP 007!" that Desmond Llewellyn did. That was his shtick and should remain so. John Cleese made a poor replacement.
*If*(and this is a big *if*) they bring her back they should have it as if they know each other, But get an actress who isn't that well known(the people who are always suggested for the role are way too well known,IMO).