Re: BOND #7
Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 6:23 pm
Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
I sell my cr dvd last year.tbp82 wrote:Spectre is in my collection as is every Bond movie. of the officiall series
I'd take anyone to replace Daniel Craig who is the least Bond like actor current;y working :tbp82 wrote:Right now which way are we leaning? Turner?
I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
Although people in the US were not huge fans of Spectre.FormerBondFan wrote:I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
But they gave their soul to SF.Capt. Sir Dominic Flandry wrote:Although people in the US were not huge fans of Spectre.FormerBondFan wrote:I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
How can you not care? If you're so against a Craig type Bond shouldnt you hope change.FormerBondFan wrote:I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
The damage has been done where the franchise can no longer be worth saving.tbp82 wrote:How can you not care? If you're so against a Craig type Bond shouldnt you hope change.FormerBondFan wrote:I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
As. successful as Craigs Bond is/was one could argue it doesnt need saving. But, it is time to movr on to a new Bond. Embrace it.FormerBondFan wrote:The damage has been done where the franchise can no longer be worth saving.tbp82 wrote:How can you not care? If you're so against a Craig type Bond shouldnt you hope change.FormerBondFan wrote:I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
Anybody or anything can be Bond now. It's the Bond brand that sells, not the actor playing him, so that's no point of caring anymore.tbp82 wrote:As. successful as Craigs Bond is/was one could argue it doesnt need saving. But, it is time to movr on to a new Bond. Embrace it.FormerBondFan wrote:The damage has been done where the franchise can no longer be worth saving.tbp82 wrote:How can you not care? If you're so against a Craig type Bond shouldnt you hope change.FormerBondFan wrote:I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
Who cares anymore? Thanks to the madness so-called "popularity" of DC's Bond, anybody or anything can be Bond as long as Babs is around.tbp82 wrote:Do you not want. to enjoy Bond movies again? Theres gotta be someone youd like to see as Bond #7.
