Page 26 of 48

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Tue Mar 22, 2016 6:23 pm
by tbp82
Whos your favorite for Bond #7?

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 8:56 am
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:Spectre is in my collection as is every Bond movie. of the officiall series
I sell my cr dvd last year.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Wed Mar 23, 2016 2:16 pm
by tbp82
I ca t collection is not complete without them.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 10:08 am
by ml94
No news over a week. :007:

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 1:49 pm
by tbp82
yeah...wonser what that means.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Thu Mar 24, 2016 7:02 pm
by Kristatos
It means that there's been enough real news that the media doesn't need to fill space with non-stories about bookies odds.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 7:00 am
by tbp82
Right now which way are we leaning? Turner?

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 7:29 am
by Kristatos
I don't put much stock in any of these rumours, to be honest. Until an official announcement is made, it's just gossip.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 11:25 am
by carl stromberg
tbp82 wrote:Right now which way are we leaning? Turner?
I'd take anyone to replace Daniel Craig who is the least Bond like actor current;y working : :wink:

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 4:45 pm
by tbp82
Cant find a good link. But on Sky1 facebook page they are some clips from The Five and Tom Cullen got a darker character than he usually plays. Hes
a very versatile Bond 7 contender.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 4:52 pm
by FormerBondFan
tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 5:21 pm
by Capt. Sir Dominic Flandry
FormerBondFan wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.
Although people in the US were not huge fans of Spectre.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 5:30 pm
by FormerBondFan
Capt. Sir Dominic Flandry wrote:
FormerBondFan wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.
Although people in the US were not huge fans of Spectre.
But they gave their soul to SF.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 5:46 pm
by tbp82
FormerBondFan wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.
How can you not care? If you're so against a Craig type Bond shouldnt you hope change.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 6:50 pm
by FormerBondFan
tbp82 wrote:
FormerBondFan wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.
How can you not care? If you're so against a Craig type Bond shouldnt you hope change.
The damage has been done where the franchise can no longer be worth saving.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2016 7:46 pm
by tbp82
FormerBondFan wrote:
tbp82 wrote:
FormerBondFan wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.
How can you not care? If you're so against a Craig type Bond shouldnt you hope change.
The damage has been done where the franchise can no longer be worth saving.
As. successful as Craigs Bond is/was one could argue it doesnt need saving. But, it is time to movr on to a new Bond. Embrace it.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 5:30 am
by FormerBondFan
tbp82 wrote:
FormerBondFan wrote:
tbp82 wrote:
FormerBondFan wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Whos your favorite for Bond #7?
I couldn't even care less about the franchise's well being anymore so to answer your question, anyone who is not a classic type as we had from Sean to Pierce. It's not for me but for the brainwashed general public, especially here in the US.
How can you not care? If you're so against a Craig type Bond shouldnt you hope change.
The damage has been done where the franchise can no longer be worth saving.
As. successful as Craigs Bond is/was one could argue it doesnt need saving. But, it is time to movr on to a new Bond. Embrace it.
Anybody or anything can be Bond now. It's the Bond brand that sells, not the actor playing him, so that's no point of caring anymore.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 6:19 am
by tbp82
Do you not want. to enjoy Bond movies again? Theres gotta be someone youd like to see as Bond #7.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 8:52 am
by FormerBondFan
tbp82 wrote:Do you not want. to enjoy Bond movies again? Theres gotta be someone youd like to see as Bond #7.
Who cares anymore? Thanks to the madness so-called "popularity" of DC's Bond, anybody or anything can be Bond as long as Babs is around.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2016 10:34 am
by John Drake
Image

It could work to Rupert Friend's advantage that he's flying under the radar of next Bond speculation and names bandied around.