Page 23 of 48

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 5:03 pm
by ml94
New movie with bond 7 in 2018...IMPOSSIBLE?

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2016 8:23 pm
by tbp82
Kristatos wrote:Rumours are not the same thing as news.
While I can't speak for ML94 I'm sure they didn't mean concrete confimed "news" of who's being screentested more something you'd classify as rumuor of who's being tested or even that testing is underway.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:59 pm
by ml94
Costume designer: "if im asked to work on the next bond movie, ill have NEW 007 to dress and that is too exciting to resist". :007:

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 5:12 pm
by ml94
Sad O'LOUGHLIN is 40, he is still under the radar...

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sun Feb 28, 2016 8:16 pm
by tbp82
yeah I like O'Loughlin

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Mon Feb 29, 2016 8:48 pm
by ml94
CLIVE STANDEN... :cheers:

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 2:14 pm
by tbp82
ml94 wrote:CLIVE STANDEN... :cheers:
Googled him. At first look can't see it due to his facial hair. But, after findning some clean shaven pics of him he's another one (along with Cullen and Turner) who resembles Adrian Paul.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Tue Mar 01, 2016 4:07 pm
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:
ml94 wrote:CLIVE STANDEN... :cheers:
Googled him. At first look can't see it due to his facial hair. But, after findning some clean shaven pics of him he's another one (along with Cullen and Turner) who resembles Adrian Paul.
I think he is on the "long list".

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 4:28 pm
by tbp82
Yeah no reason he wouldnt be. I'm interested to see more realistic rumuors start to come out. Even Craig started to get rumblings. I think its a matter of when not if.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Wed Mar 02, 2016 6:34 pm
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:Yeah no reason he wouldnt be. I'm interested to see more realistic rumuors start to come out. Even Craig started to get rumblings. I think its a matter of when not if.
Me too, its matter of time...

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 5:52 pm
by tbp82
Do you think they will go after someone specific much like it's been said they went after Clive Owen? and if so who do you think that might be?

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 8:59 pm
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:Do you think they will go after someone specific much like it's been said they went after Clive Owen? and if so who do you think that might be?
Maybe...but i dont have any "SPECIFIC" actor in mind. :007:

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Mar 04, 2016 9:28 pm
by tbp82
Saw where Tom Cullen is gonna be in a show called The Five. Its a crime show. Will be interesting if Cullen has any action scenes.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 7:03 am
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:Saw where Tom Cullen is gonna be in a show called The Five. Its a crime show. Will be interesting if Cullen has any action scenes.
:cheers:

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sat Mar 05, 2016 9:36 am
by ml94
SAM HEUGHAN.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:04 pm
by ml94
Turner odds 6/1 to 4/1... :up: :up:

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 2:11 pm
by tbp82
Let's hope he's the frontrunner but how legit are these odds though. We see names like Tom Hardy and Henry Cavill consistently at the top of these list when its very likely with their schedule they couldn't take on the role of Bond even if they wanted to.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 3:37 pm
by Kristatos
I don't put any stock in these odds at all. Bookies have no idea how to lay odds on anything other than sporting events. They are figures that are more or less plucked out of the air.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:31 pm
by carl stromberg
Next Bond candidates list in The Guardian.

http://www.theguardian.com/film/2016/ma ... idris-elba

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Wed Mar 09, 2016 10:14 am
by ml94
Im sure EON has gone little further than researching actors. :007: