He's pretty think skinned if he lets fans keep him from doing a Bond film.But they can be pretty brutal.in the the end Mendes may pass on it, with the leak there wasn't the universal praise he might expect
Lee Tamawhorey,anyone?
He's pretty think skinned if he lets fans keep him from doing a Bond film.But they can be pretty brutal.in the the end Mendes may pass on it, with the leak there wasn't the universal praise he might expect
He couldn't give a ratass about the Bond fans, nor could Craig or the wonder twins running, rather ruining, Eon. It was the industry that had the bad reaction to it. Perhaps the only reaction that matters. The spin was obvious, Bond meets the man with the golden globes, adulation should have followed unquestioningly, but the negative tone might make him reconsider a commitment. A big payday might be king though. It certainly is true for Craig.katied wrote:He's pretty think skinned if he lets fans keep him from doing a Bond film.But they can be pretty brutal.in the the end Mendes may pass on it, with the leak there wasn't the universal praise he might expect
Lee Tamawhorey,anyone?![]()
![]()
![]()
![]()
I don't have a problem with Mendes..he would be preferrable to all the usual names mentioned.In a way I hopes he does it, between his and Craig's desires for dense symbolist claptrap it will be the most bloated piece of s**t out of Hollywood for ages. Stir in Babs disdain for all things Bond along with her political leanings and her desire to please the theater crowd she adores this movies will be cram-packed with meaningless symbolism. Probably tanking like all of Mendes recent projects.

I honestly think Eon have forgotten how to make Bond films.Kristatos wrote:Where do you get these crazy ideas?007 wrote:They should hire an action/adventure director and remember that Bond is supposed to be fun.
Whatever problems with Bond 23 will be it is not going to start with or be fixed by Mendes. As you guys are saying it the problems primarily originate with the producers intent.007 wrote:I honestly think Eon have forgotten how to make Bond films.Kristatos wrote:Where do you get these crazy ideas?007 wrote:They should hire an action/adventure director and remember that Bond is supposed to be fun.
What do you think needs fixing to make Bond films better? Better scriptwriters?katied wrote:The credibility issue is also why I have a problem with fans suggesting some well known director..like that(or any other gimmick-like 3D-is going to fix what's wrong with the Bond franchise.As if!
Speaking for myself, I'd say regime change at EON and the franchise back in the hands of people who actually care about Bond. Babs' obvious disdain for the character didn't begin with the Craig era, either. Looking back at the Brosnan films with the benefit of hindsight, you can see that they are peppered with little snarks like M's infamous "sexist, misogynist dinosaur" speech from Goldeneye and Q's new-found catchphrase of "grow up, 007". Let her do the middlebrow, Oscar-chasing films she so obviously wants to make and leave Bond to somebody who likes him.The Sweeney wrote:What do you think needs fixing to make Bond films better? Better scriptwriters?katied wrote:The credibility issue is also why I have a problem with fans suggesting some well known director..like that(or any other gimmick-like 3D-is going to fix what's wrong with the Bond franchise.As if!
This. It shouldn't be *too* hard to appeal to someone to get Babs out of there. Actually effecting it would be another deal entirely. She feels like that is HER job and she was born into it(which she was. but she's screwed it up.Badly.)Speaking for myself, I'd say regime change at EON and the franchise back in the hands of people who actually care about Bond. Babs' obvious disdain for the character didn't begin with the Craig era, either. Looking back at the Brosnan films with the benefit of hindsight, you can see that they are peppered with little snarks like M's infamous "sexist, misogynist dinosaur" speech from Goldeneye and Q's new-found catchphrase of "grow up, 007". Let her do the middlebrow, Oscar-chasing films she so obviously wants to make and leave Bond to somebody who likes him.
It's quite amusing that Cubby Broccoli created the bond franchise then left it in the hands of a left-wing woman in Barbara Broccoli. She did an ok job with the Brosnan era. When Dana Broccoli died, MG Wilson took a back seat and Barbara had the chance to cast a new Bond, she rebooted the series with Daniel Craig as Bond showing her disdain for her father's work.Kristatos wrote:Speaking for myself, I'd say regime change at EON and the franchise back in the hands of people who actually care about Bond. Babs' obvious disdain for the character didn't begin with the Craig era, either. Looking back at the Brosnan films with the benefit of hindsight, you can see that they are peppered with little snarks like M's infamous "sexist, misogynist dinosaur" speech from Goldeneye and Q's new-found catchphrase of "grow up, 007". Let her do the middlebrow, Oscar-chasing films she so obviously wants to make and leave Bond to somebody who likes him.The Sweeney wrote:What do you think needs fixing to make Bond films better? Better scriptwriters?katied wrote:The credibility issue is also why I have a problem with fans suggesting some well known director..like that(or any other gimmick-like 3D-is going to fix what's wrong with the Bond franchise.As if!
I have no idea what Cubby's politics were, and they're actually pretty irrelevant, since he saw himself as creating purely escapist entertainment. The issue is not BB's politics per se, but the fact that she seems to have decided to use the Bond films as her own personal soapbox.Gary Seven wrote:It's quite amusing that Cubby Broccoli created the bond franchise then left it in the hands of a left-wing woman in Barbara Broccoli.
Nah, she would just prefer to use the Bond films as an outlet for her "artiness"It's a pity that Barbara Broccoli cannot work with others in producing regular Bond movies whilst pursuing other more artistic projects.

You could say they became political as far back as GE, with the change of a female M instead of a male M.Harvey Wallbanger wrote:The Bond Movies and Fleming were never very political - until CR
I posted years ago about the letter she wrote Bill O'Reilly blindly defending Cindy Sheehan -which was popular at the time.
It depends how loosely you define the word "political". The change to a female M was inspired by the promotion of Stella Rimmington to head of MI5, so it's not really a political statement. If you class that as political, you could say that the Bond films have always been political in that Bond never questions the superiority of the capitalist West to the communist East, but that's rather overstretching the definition of what constitutes a political film.The Sweeney wrote: You could say they became political as far back as GE, with the change of a female M instead of a male M.
Actually I don't think scriptwriters would help, they have brought in two of the best to work on the scripts. I predict that will not matter either for Bond23The Sweeney wrote:What do you think needs fixing to make Bond films better? Better scriptwriters?katied wrote:The credibility issue is also why I have a problem with fans suggesting some well known director..like that(or any other gimmick-like 3D-is going to fix what's wrong with the Bond franchise.As if!