Page 16 of 48

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 8:02 am
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:How was Turner in it.
Very BOND(ian)...he can play BOND tomorrow.
Found And Then There Were None on Youtube. Yes Philip Lombard has some Bond moments there and I love some of his lines . Gotta question though how much of this performance being Bondish is Turner? If Friend, Stevens, or Cullen were in this part I think fan reaction would be just as strong.
Yeah, they ALL can pull it off...

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 5:44 pm
by tbp82
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:How was Turner in it.
Very BOND(ian)...he can play BOND tomorrow.
Found And Then There Were None on Youtube. Yes Philip Lombard has some Bond moments there and I love some of his lines . Gotta question though how much of this performance being Bondish is Turner? If Friend, Stevens, or Cullen were in this part I think fan reaction would be just as strong.
Yeah, they ALL can pull it off...
You had Friend as your top choice right? Did Turners performance here move him over Friend?

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 7:58 pm
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:How was Turner in it.
Very BOND(ian)...he can play BOND tomorrow.
Found And Then There Were None on Youtube. Yes Philip Lombard has some Bond moments there and I love some of his lines . Gotta question though how much of this performance being Bondish is Turner? If Friend, Stevens, or Cullen were in this part I think fan reaction would be just as strong.
Yeah, they ALL can pull it off...
You had Friend as your top choice right? Did Turners performance here move him over Friend?
No, but he is VERY close...did you watch HITMAN? :007:

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Wed Dec 30, 2015 9:21 pm
by tbp82
Not yet. Probably get to it tonight its only 96 minutes runtime.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2015 9:07 am
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:Not yet. Probably get to it tonight its only 96 minutes runtime.
Did you watch it lastnight? :007:

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2015 2:25 pm
by tbp82
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Not yet. Probably get to it tonight its only 96 minutes runtime.
Did you watch it lastnight? :007:

I did. A Skyfall preview kicked it off before the menu screen. Don't know if it was The Skyfall preview or what but had some Casino Royale vibes in the beginning. Friend was believable in his action screens. Would like to see him pack on some mass if he evers tries to be Bond again.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Thu Dec 31, 2015 11:07 pm
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Not yet. Probably get to it tonight its only 96 minutes runtime.
Did you watch it lastnight? :007:

I did. A Skyfall preview kicked it off before the menu screen. Don't know if it was The Skyfall preview or what but had some Casino Royale vibes in the beginning. Friend was believable in his action screens. Would like to see him pack on some mass if he evers tries to be Bond again.
I think EVERY male actor wants to play BOND...

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 2:34 am
by tbp82
Did you see And then there were none episode 2?

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 7:12 am
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:Did you see And then there were none episode 2?
Not yet.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 3:10 pm
by tbp82
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Did you see And then there were none episode 2?
Not yet.
For you right now what makes Friend your top choice?

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 5:49 pm
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Did you see And then there were none episode 2?
Not yet.
For you right now what makes Friend your top choice?
Because he was PRETTY close to get the role decade ago. :007:

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 7:29 pm
by tbp82
Would ve been interesting to see a Friend Bond in Casino Royale.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 8:28 pm
by Kristatos
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Did you see And then there were none episode 2?
Not yet.
For you right now what makes Friend your top choice?
Because he was PRETTY close to get the role decade ago. :007:
Was he? I thought the shortlist was Craig, Henry Cavill and Sam Worthington.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 8:40 pm
by tbp82
Kristatos wrote:
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:
ml94 wrote:
tbp82 wrote:Did you see And then there were none episode 2?
Not yet.
For you right now what makes Friend your top choice?
Because he was PRETTY close to get the role decade ago. :007:
Was he? I thought the shortlist was Craig, Henry Cavill and Sam Worthington.
Somebody was quoted as stating at one time he was as much a contender as Cavill. I ve heard Worthington Julian Mcmahon Goran Vinjsc and Alex O'Loughlin as part of the final four. Don't know if the true final four has ever been cleared up.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 8:51 pm
by ml94
Cavill was 22 (!) when he made screentests...

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Fri Jan 01, 2016 10:01 pm
by tbp82
ml94 wrote:Cavill was 22 (!) when he made screentests...
I still think he'd be a great Bond but I think that ship has sailed.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 7:05 am
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:
ml94 wrote:Cavill was 22 (!) when he made screentests...
I still think he'd be a great Bond but I think that ship has sailed.
Yeah, he is SUPERMAN now.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 6:32 pm
by tbp82
Cavill has the look for sure. He Cullen and Turner are as Bond as you can get.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 6:33 pm
by tbp82
Cavill has the look for sure. He Cullen and Turner are as Bond as you can get.

Re: BOND #7

Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2016 8:08 pm
by ml94
tbp82 wrote:Cavill has the look for sure. He Cullen and Turner are as Bond as you can get.
DEFINITELY. :007: