

But this is wayy worse. This is not meeting on set and happening to screw around. This is Craig saying I refuse to work until you hire me a woman who will sleep with me. This is that actress being hired not for her skill as an actress but for her willingness to cater to Craig's desires.kater23 wrote:If this is a "worried about being sued" thing..I mean, it is an ACKNLOWEDGED thing that Craig is a cheat.
I can't blindly believe it, as I don't have a grudge against Craig. The press will make make up any old story, then again, I don't know what happens on set. I don't follow the filming as closely as I used to, so I don't know what has been going on.bjmdds wrote:Stop being so skeptical and believe in our own Ale![]()
You shouldn't blindly believe anything, that's my point. The balance of evidence seems to point to the story being true, but that's not the same thing.Daltonite Toothpaste wrote:I can't blindly believe it, as I don't have a grudge against Craig.bjmdds wrote:Stop being so skeptical and believe in our own Ale![]()
Also Craig is going to wear a white dinner jacket which should provide a few laughs.A few weeks ago, some hapless young man who’d got himself a job as a translator on the Morocco set of SPECTRE posted a photo of Daniel Craig’s back on Instagram, along with the subtle hashtag #actorsareassholes.
Does he believe he is McQueen 2.0? I know they went to great lengths to model Daniel after him I never thought once Daniel believed the hype.The Sweeney wrote:It's utterly outrageous if it is true. I know Craig fancies himself as Steve McQueen Mk2, who was famous for this kind of behaviour, but this is taking it a little far isn't it.
It is an insight into a dark and nasty industry if this kind of thing does go on. And also makes you wonder how many other big Hollywood star actors are playing the same game. It is, as Omega rightly said, nothing short of prostitution.....
Well, being in possession of certain...additional information makes me want to go back and rewrite the whole thing from scratch. But it's hard enough to find the time to write new chapters. Mr White's death scene was so overripe that the parody practically wrote itself. I don't know that the rest of the film will make it that easy.dirtybenny wrote:By all means add it to the discussion thread as a "lost chapter" I'd for one love to tread it!Kristatos wrote: I still wish I'd heard about it before I wrote an earlier chapter of the unofficial novelisation, though.
"Blessed with Craig's fifth instalment..." blessed isn't exactly the word I would use but oh well...carl stromberg wrote:I can't believe Daniel Craig is a Bill Cosbyesque character.
Although a translator on Spectre thinks Craig is an "asshole":
http://birthmoviesdeath.com/2015/07/09/ ... in-spectre
Also Craig is going to wear a white dinner jacket which should provide a few laughs.A few weeks ago, some hapless young man who’d got himself a job as a translator on the Morocco set of SPECTRE posted a photo of Daniel Craig’s back on Instagram, along with the subtle hashtag #actorsareassholes.
I actually don't think it was Seydoux. I think the "new role" was actually Estrella, played by Stephanie Sigman. There is an Estrella in the shooting script, but it is a much smaller role than Madeline Swann, which makes it more likely to have been added in later, although it didn't feel shoehorned in. In fact, the film follows the classic "three girl" Bond formula, with Estrella being the one who gets seduced by Bond in the opening scenes and is never heard from again (later in the film, there is a scene where Moneypenny visits Bond in his flat and hears a voice coming from the bedroom saying "Come back to bed, James", but the script doesn't state whether this is Estrella or not). (I doubt anybody here will object to SPECTRE spoilers, but i used spoiler tags just in case.Veronica wrote: Ale,God bless you! Seriously,this is beyond moronic. This is like a harem institution. And Lea Seydoux acctually AGREED go that?! And I thought she was smart. Its funny how it says "acting talent" is secondary when infact she is way more talented actress than Belucci. they should ALL be fired and by all I mean Craig and moronic EON. Seriously?
Did Lea agree to that because being in a Bond movie would raise her profile? That's the only explanation I have. I mean she was the one who fought around with Kechiche because of explicit sex scenes in "Blue is the warmest color".
Kristatos wrote:I actually don't think it was Seydoux. I think the "new role" was actually Estrella, played by Stephanie Sigman. There is an Estrella in the shooting script, but it is a much smaller role than Madeline Swann, which makes it more likely to have been added in later, although it didn't feel shoehorned in. In fact, the film follows the classic "three girl" Bond formula, with Estrella being the one who gets seduced by Bond in the opening scenes and is never heard from again (later in the film, there is a scene where Moneypenny visits Bond in his flat and hears a voice coming from the bedroom saying "Come back to bed, James", but the script doesn't state whether this is Estrella or not). (I doubt anybody here will object to SPECTRE spoilers, but i used spoiler tags just in case.Veronica wrote: Ale,God bless you! Seriously,this is beyond moronic. This is like a harem institution. And Lea Seydoux acctually AGREED go that?! And I thought she was smart. Its funny how it says "acting talent" is secondary when infact she is way more talented actress than Belucci. they should ALL be fired and by all I mean Craig and moronic EON. Seriously?
Did Lea agree to that because being in a Bond movie would raise her profile? That's the only explanation I have. I mean she was the one who fought around with Kechiche because of explicit sex scenes in "Blue is the warmest color".
Looking at Sigman's IMDb filmography, it's all been Mexican film and TV up to this point. This is her first role in a Hollywood movie, whereas Seydoux has been in things like The Grand Budapest Hotel. That would make Sigman more likely than Seydoux to need the casting couch, I would submit. But of course this is all supposition on my part.
The Saint 007 wrote:But yet the Craig fanatics continue to make fun of Moore and Brosnan as being too effeminate.bjmdds wrote:Lea Seydoux on her character:"She's strong but she's like (James) Bond in a way. She's strong and she's very sensitive. She's very fragile and I think that Bond is the same way so she became more masculine and I think "Bond is more feminine". I think (James Bond) brings something very modern because he has this duality and I think that's what we like to see; more like tortured."............this is why Cr-egg's era is a disgrace and the feminization of Bond by Broccoli MUST end![]()
I always like how these actresses talk about the strong/independent Bond girl as if it was something new, when it's already been done in the past.