I very much like Ralph Fiennes but as M? WITH CRAIG AS BOND?! He would work as M with HENRY CAVILL as Bond, and even so, he'd still be Voldemort. I just don't know what the hell they're thinking. First Q, now M is also WAY younger looking and WAY better looking than Bond? Where the hell have we landed?! In an alternate universe?!bjmdds wrote:It's setting up as a movie more about Dench and Fiennes and Q and MP then about Bond: The internet is already buzzing negatively: "There's no question that the franchise just won't be the same without Dench. But will fans warm to Fiennes in the role the way they have embraced John Cleese as Q? Or will the thought of the world's freedom being in the hands of Lord Voldemort be too much? Either way, it looks like this time, Chicken Little was right, because the sky really is falling in the 007 universe." http://www.worstpreviews.com/images/hea ... e22204.jpg This is NOT MHe is a youthful 49 and looks better than Danielle. It's nuts
This is how the casting should be: Henry Cavill plays Bond, Jeremy Northam plays M. and someone OLDER plays Q.In other news there was an episode of the Simpsons on tonight with PIERCE being the voice of the new futuristic Simpsons house and it was not only hilarious but entirely too charming and sexy. I just gloated hearing Bart go "let's try the 007 voice!" and Marge "Ohh.. Roger Moore??" and Lisa "NO! Pierce Brosnan!" TAKE THAT Craigster, after that, they never made an episode about you, because YOU are not James Bond to the world.. you're that miscast dude who happens to play James Bond now. (I shall be done gloating now)
