RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness & oestrogen

General Bond discussion from Sean Connery to Pierce Brosnan
Post Reply
User avatar
Goldeneye
Site Admin
Posts: 1985
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 5:58 pm

RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness & oestrogen

Post by Goldeneye »

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timst ... oestrogen/
Tim Stanley
Dr Tim Stanley is a historian of the United States. His biography of Pat Buchanan is out now. His personal website is http://www.timothystanley.co.uk and you can follow him on Twitter @timothy_stanley.
RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness and an overdose of oestrogen
The trailer for the new Bond movie Skyfall has landed – and it looks rubbish. The video above is how it should be done. Sorry, but Bond ain’t Bond unless he’s flying into space with a Russian minx called Tatyana Innerthigh on a deadly mission to kill a fat bald man with a cat.

The rot set in with the casting of Daniel Craig. Things had been going a little haywire since the late 1980s, when the producers first caved into the non-existent popular demand for political correctness. But being the 1980s, they interpreted that to mean people would like to see beautiful ladies with big chests occasionally firing a gun (Hell, yeah!). Then along came Pierce Brosnan and things returned to their campy natural order. “I thought Christmas only came once a year,” etcetera, etcetera.

But Craig was all wrong for the part and signalled the intention of the moviemakers to turn Bond into Raymond Chandler without the laughs. They fail to pull it off because the pressure to sell theatre tickets means they have to betray their own vision. So, on the one hand we have Bond going to psychiatrists, emoting, feeling pain, getting angry, breaking fingers, pulling out a man’s spleen with his teeth, yada yada. On the other hand, we have him leaping 30 foot chasms, turning cars upside down, or sinking half of Venice. Through it all there’s the mawkish “family” of MI6, headed by Judi “Brave But Fragile” Dench. Bernard Lee’s “M” was a gruff Head Boy. Dench is a prissy school mistress with a crush on one of her pupils – Grazia Magazine’s idea of a strong woman.

As for Craig himself, his body is all wrong. Roger Moore’s body was always that of a slightly overweight middle-aged man with a taste for brandy and cigars. He probably required a stunt double for strenuous walking. Connery, whilst lithe to begin with, was a hairy bread pudding by the early 1970s (hairy everywhere but his head). There’s a scene in Diamonds Are Forever where the delicious Jill St John (who also bedded Henry Kissinger) looks at the naked Connery and says, “Why James, there’s more to you than meets the eye.” Yeah, about 4 stone I’d imagine.

Connery and Moore played their parts in an age when character trumped looks and women were encouraged to find a man attractive well into his seventies. They might have had prostate trouble, but they also had wit and charm. And we, the heterosexual men for whom these movies are made, could watch them and aspire to be them. For the price of a safari jacket, at least.

By contrast, Daniel Craig is the Bond for the Men’s Health Magazine generation – an absurd body that no human being could replicate squeezed into a pair of orange trunks. Gentlemen, Bond has been stolen from us and redesigned to appeal to women. In order to keep the men glued to their seats, the producers throw in lashings of sadistic violence. Without innuendo, Bond has thus become violent feminine porn. It’s not much fun unless you’re into hard pecs and snapped necks.

How to rescue the series, if we must? Follow this simple formula. 1) Replace Daniel Craig with a slightly older, arthritic actor with a twinkle in his eye. Frankly, I think Roger Moore could still do it. 2) Think big. Have Bond save the world from a giant death ray on Mars. And make sure the villain goes waaaay over budget on uniforms. 3) Give the evil mastermind a strong foreign accent and a parrot. 4) Don’t forget that beyond all this War on Terror stuff, Britain’s nemesis is always Russia. So lots of blonde women in KGB uniforms. 5) Replace the unfunny John Cleese with Rolf Harris. 6) More girls, more guns and a piranha tank

Modern moviemakers increasingly don’t understand what the movies are for. They’re about the creation and nurturing of myth. Folks buy movie tickets to see Johnny Weissmuller swinging through the trees, Raquel Welch fight a pterodactyl, or Beatty and Dunaway evaporate in a hail of bullets. They don’t pay to watch someone else’s idea of what is clever or “zeitgeist defining.” We want magic and mystery. We want invisible cars and Union Jack parachutes. We want Roger Moore. We want the biggest, we want the best. We want Bond. And beyond.
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14813
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness & oestro

Post by bjmdds »

He knows it too. It's over. The character interpretations are a disgrace now......on to other franchises.......
Image
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness & oestro

Post by The Sweeney »

`We want invisible cars....' :shock:

Sorry guys but this written piece has no credibilty whatsoever. I doubt this person even knows who Ian Fleming is.
Read Graham Rye's response to this article below it (a person who does know his Bond).
User avatar
Mazer Rackham
Q
Posts: 1569
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 8:50 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Thunderball
From Russia with love
Location: Eros

Re: RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness & oestro

Post by Mazer Rackham »

He thinks John Cleese a.)unfunny and b.) has a job on the Bond set. He's taking a piss.

There is a line of thought about the wimping out of Bond do to politically correct influences so perhaps he is serious about that part.
"That f**king truck driver!" Ian Fleming
User avatar
Alessandra
Pam Bouvier
Posts: 1413
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 7:04 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Dr No, Goldfinger, Goldeneye, Tomorrow Never Dies, The World is Not Enough, License to Kill, The Spy Who Loved Me.
Favorite Movies: Sabrina (the original), To Catch a Thief, Charade, High Society, Indiscreet. More recent: The Blind Side, Top Gun, Jerry Maguire, Someone Like You, Wolverine, Spy Game, Miami Vice, Fantastic Four, No Reservations, The Wedding Date, 27 Dresses, How to Lose a Guy in Ten Days, The Devil Wears Prada

Re: RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness & oestro

Post by Alessandra »

I'd call it a weird article.

Maybe he doesn't know that most NON-Uk women actually DO NOT find Daniel Craig attractive? Or his body for that matter. If you want to please women, you give us Pierce Brosnan, not Daniel Craig (and I think it is absolutely indisputable that the percentage of women who like Pierce Brosnan is way higher than that of those who like Daniel Craig). You give us HENRY CAVILL, not Daniel Craig. It's the usual thing, when men are too focused on their "I want an old Bond" mantra, they lose sight of the main objective: Connery wasn't old at all when he started, and he was fit. And those were the best movies. And no, Connery is NOT like Craig at all. Zero to do with him. Not in terms of looks, not in terms of acting, not in terms of charisma, not in terms of anything. Henry Cavill, amongst the younger actors, is the one who can get the closest to the original Bond, and actually also "modernize" it. I'm sorry if I sound like a broken record, but it's the way it is.

No I do NOT like seeing Bond as an older man with too much weight on him. And I don't think Roger Moore was like that at all when he took over the role. He was good looking and fit. I also don't think Craig is a poster for Men's Health A)looks WAY too old for his age B)looks WAY too pale all the time and C) he is WAY too thin (look at him when they don't pump him up on set while doing Bond and you'll see). There are a few general thoughts I agree with in that article, but a lot of it, while truly disliking Craig in the role and sharing his thoughts that he's all wrong, I just disagree with.
"Are we on coms?"
User avatar
Greg Haugen
New Recruit
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:31 pm

Re: RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness & oestro

Post by Greg Haugen »

Note in Graham Rye's response that he admits Craig looks nothing like James Bond and also reveals that he hates most of the Bond films, writing off Diamonds Are Forever, the entire Roger Moore era and Die Another Day. From what I remember of his magazine/site Graham Rye dislikes GoldenEye too and doesn't have much time for Licence To Kill. I don't suppose he thinks the remaining Brosnan films are much cop and I would imagine he's the sort of person who found You Only Live Twice stupid and too gadget laden. So he likes what? A couple of Craig and Connery films? Not much of a fan of the James Bond film series then.
User avatar
Napoleon Solo
Agent
Posts: 529
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 4:56 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia With Love
Contact:

Re: RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness & oestro

Post by Napoleon Solo »

Greg Haugen wrote:Note in Graham Rye's response that he admits Craig looks nothing like James Bond and also reveals that he hates most of the Bond films, writing off Diamonds Are Forever, the entire Roger Moore era and Die Another Day. From what I remember of his magazine/site Graham Rye dislikes GoldenEye too and doesn't have much time for Licence To Kill. I don't suppose he thinks the remaining Brosnan films are much cop and I would imagine he's the sort of person who found You Only Live Twice stupid and too gadget laden. So he likes what? A couple of Craig and Connery films? Not much of a fan of the James Bond film series then.
Here's his autobiography. It's a little long:

(through the 1980s):

http://www.007magazine.co.uk/biography/biography.htm

1990s:
http://www.007magazine.co.uk/biography/biography2.htm

2000s:
http://www.007magazine.co.uk/biography/biography3.htm
User avatar
Greg Haugen
New Recruit
Posts: 19
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 7:31 pm

Re: RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness & oestro

Post by Greg Haugen »

Yeah, I used to be a member and have some out of print back issues of 007 Magazine - including the Thunderball & OHMSS specials. It was a great magazine and he did a great job in keeping Bond fandom alive (well before the internet too) but I just find him one of those people who seems to hate about 90% of the Bond films. As for him saying Craig is the best Bond with Sean Connery when he doesn't even think Craig looks like James Bond. Weird. I looked at his FB page once out of interest to see if there was any interesting Bond chat and it seemed to mostly consist of him railing against criminals and calling for them all to be killed or something. No idea what that was all about. I'm sure he's a nice chap but he should probably be running Daniel Craig Magazine instead of 007 Magazine I think.
User avatar
CaptainLewis
Agent
Posts: 626
Joined: Wed Dec 03, 2008 12:37 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Goldeneye
O.H.M.S.S.
Favorite Movies: Alien & Aliens
Inception
The Shawshank Redemption
Pulp Fiction

Re: RIP James Bond: killed by political correctness & oestro

Post by CaptainLewis »

Another article by Stanley.
Skyfall: I don't want a 'dark' James Bond film, I want snobbery with violence

The new Bond film, Skyfall, has landed, but I won’t be going to see it. When it comes to James Bond, I remain a Roger Moore partisan – and I’m convinced that he could still play the part. If anything, Roger looks better now that he did when he was still in work.

Everyone’s very excited about Skyfall because it’s supposed to contain great acting and directing. There's even rumour of an Oscar nod. How has it garnered so much acclaim? The way all movies do nowadays: shoot it with the lights off and call it 'dark'.

This time Bond is nearly killed, M's loyalty is called in to question and… it gets personal.

Skyfall is being marketed as The Dark Knight Rises of spy movies, which means lots of brooding silences and ugly relationships. Dark is a lesser artist's shorthand for deep, but it rarely works. Movies are a visual form, so any effort to communicate inner turmoil either requires the genius of Tarkovsky or else it comes across as a lot of mumbled dialogue about 'betrayal' and 'loyalty.' The only intellectual satisfaction I took from the Dark Knight Rises was when I fell asleep and had a dream about socking Sigmund Freud in the mouth. Analyse that.

A large part of the problem is Daniel Craig. Craig is an excellent actor, but Bond is a part better played by a knitting catalogue model or a 60-year-old Lothario who charmed the producer’s wife. Craig gives the character emotional depth that it doesn’t deserve, while his physique turns Bond from a dandy super agent in a common-or-garden thug. Wit is impossible; charm has been replaced by threat. His body looks like it’s been put into one of those crushers at a car graveyard then forced into a pair of swimming trunks. And while Sean Connery and Roger Moore had laser pens and magnetic watches, Craig’s secret weapon is probably a snooker ball in a sock. Can you imagine this ape winning at Baccarat? Knowing the recipe for the perfect White Russian? He looks like his idea of class is not dropping your fish and chips in the middle of a fist fight.

All in all, I'm predicting Skyfall will have the charm and good humour of a night spent manning the phones at the Samaritans. Its miserabilism reflects a culture that thinks suffering automatically creates credibility – a world where X Factor contestants weep for our votes because last week their gran sustained a paper cut while opening a gas bill.

What so many movie makers seem to have forgotten is that a) most of us go to the flicks for a laugh and b) flying cars and giggling sexpots made plenty of money for Bond in the past.

Ditch the grimace, Bond. Have a Martini, go for a spin in the Aston Martin and give a cheer for gratuitous sex and violence.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/timst ... -violence/
Post Reply