bjmdds wrote:Hideous Baboon? Put it this way EA, if Cr-egg was in a Tarzan remake he would NOT be playing the role of one of the humans! His Neanderthalic persona fits better with the jungle elements rather than the human elements, for sure. To even consider Cr-egg as an equal to a Cavill-type for Bond to me is ludicrous. Once the Babster plays the cougar role to Henry, Cr-egg will be gone UNLESS Cavill has taste and rebuffs her balcony advances.

BJ, you are a genius. I laughed so hard at this I can't even begin to explain.
Now, about that last part. No, no, no. I protest, Your Honor! The Babster will keep going on with her Cr-egg crush, except he won't be Bond anymore since others won't let him. She will try to play the cougar role to Henry, only to be forced to stay away from him by both production AND Cavill himself. Cavill DOES have taste so he will be MY boyfriend, not the Babster's!

Ahem.
Now in all seriousness, the part about "even considering Cr-egg as an equal to a Cavill-type for Bond is ludicrous" is just about exactly how I feel. I would gladly take bets about how women would answer if we asked "would you consider Mr Craig as an equal type to Mr Cavill to be your boyfriend?"

That is not to say that there aren't women who would gladly get Craig, just that one or the other is just not the same thing
EA. Where are your thoughts here? MI6 and Cb.net are "general" Bond sites? Are you kidding? There is such animus there for any contrary Cr-egg thought that once a poster is deemed anti-eggster, they are villified, mocked, attacked, and basically shown the door! Once again, contrary thoughts here that are not in a nasty derogatory tone are always welcome. That is NOT the case on the two sites you just mentioned. General Bond discussions are what actually takes place on this thread every single day. The casting of a loser spawned this site. The continuation of this site will go on long after the mistake will be corrected.
Having experienced the above at CBn, I am in complete agreement with this. People who are well-behaved are more than welcome here no matter what they think. Heck, there's even someone who is one really crazily-in-love-with Craig fan on the other nice forum that shares the views we have here... I didn't quite know how to react to him at first, because I was shocked by his statements

I had one of those "Seriously?" reactions once and then realized I may have been too harsh with him and felt so bad about it, so posted right after saying I didn't mean to come off as harsh, telling him I just wanted to make it clear where things stood for me. The poor kid is just in love with Craig, and there's nothing wrong with that since he isn't rude to other people or anything like it. He's just seriously crazily in love with Craig. If someone totally in love with Brosnan like this guy is with Craig dared posting on CBn, they would be vilified, mocked, attacked just like BJ said. They wouldn't last more than five minutes. Not even Cavill is an even remotely mentionable option in that place. Only a Craig lookalike will do for them. It's just shameful, really.
I'm absolutely certain the continuation of this site will go on long after the mistake they made with Craig will be corrected, since like you I think what goes on here everyday IS general Bond discussion.
I think barbarabroccoliisnotcubby.com would be a good domain name. It also points to the crux of the problem.
Excellent point!
We've talked about this and it depends. If the next actor to play Bond is as unsuitable as Craig, we may name it "x is not Bond" or something more general like "classicbond.com". If someone like Cavill, who most of us are happy with, gets the nod, it's hard to tell. Somebody suggested "danielcraigwasnotbond.com".
You know what, that's actually a great solution. It retains the essence of the site, and if that happened, it would mean Cavill is Bond. Heaven for me. Except I would probably need to be dragged out of the movie theater when the movie is released, as I'd spend all day in there watching Cavill with heart-shaped eyes

(I exaggerate about this on purpose, let it be clear. I wouldn't want to be thought of as a freaking stalker, that is not the case!

)