The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

General Bond discussion from Sean Connery to Pierce Brosnan
Post Reply
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

bjmdds wrote:She is definitely "Alicia Silverstone Clueless" about Bond, that is for sure.

Absolutely! And has been for a while. :mrgreen: :mrgreen:
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Star Trek should top Wolverine's $85 million, but will it top the $100 million mark with a TRUE prequel with actors who actually look younger than those before them, unlike Craig who looks older than those that came before him? Jackman should be Bond now.
Image
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

bjmdds wrote:Star Trek should top Wolverine's $85 million, but will it top the $100 million mark with a TRUE prequel with actors who actually look younger than those before them, unlike Craig who looks older than those that came before him? Jackman should be Bond now.
I believe most of the actors in the Star Trek movie are in their 20's/early -mid 30's (Simon Pegg is 39 but could pass for 34 :P ) and Eric Bana is in his late 30's or early 40's. They're very well cast.
User avatar
Blowfeld
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence
Posts: 3195
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 9:03 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Goldfinger
For Your Eyes only
The Living Daylights
Location: the world

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Blowfeld »

Simon Pegg does look younger than in his 40s. Poor Daniel looked in his 40s by this late 20s.
Image
"Those were the days when we still associated Bond with suave, old school actors such as Sean Connery and Roger Moore,"
"Daniel didn't have a hint of suave about him," - Patsy Palmer
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

Simon Pegg for Bond #7! just kidding! :lol: seriously though, he IS young looking compared to Crag,I mean Craig :P

Maybe it's time for EON to pay for a face lift for Daniel Craig :lol:
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Eon needs a facelift from Broccoli's current influence.
Image
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

They could do a Six Million Dollar Man on Daniel Craig. "We can rebuild him.We have the capability". :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
stockslivevan
SPECTRE 02
Posts: 3249
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:13 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia with Love
Location: Crab Key

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by stockslivevan »

Someone mention Trek?

Frankly it's poorly cast. An underwear model as CAPTAIN JAMES T KIRK? Right. Kirk is supposed to be a man, not surprised you guys approve given how some here think Cavill is ideal as Bond. :lol:


Kirk
Image
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

I don't approve of Cavill :lol: Plus, he's not long enough in the tooth for EON's liking! :twisted:
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

stockslivevan wrote:Someone mention Trek?

Frankly it's poorly cast. An underwear model as CAPTAIN JAMES T KIRK? Right. Kirk is supposed to be a man, not surprised you guys approve given how some here think Cavill is ideal as Bond. :lol:


Kirk
Image
Star Trek is poorly cast as a "Prequel" yet CR was properly cast as a "Prequel"? Are you kidding? Cavill was mentioned as a potential future Bond down the road or as a true prequel Bond, not as a current, distinguished, experienced Bond. By the way, what's the deal with James "SIBERIUS" Kirk in this new film? :shock:
Image
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

katied wrote:They could do a Six Million Dollar Man on Daniel Craig. "We can rebuild him.We have the capability". :lol: :lol: :lol:
There's NO amount of money to transform Craig into a proper Bond. :lol:
Image
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

bjmdds wrote:
katied wrote:They could do a Six Million Dollar Man on Daniel Craig. "We can rebuild him.We have the capability". :lol: :lol: :lol:
There's NO amount of money to transform Craig into a proper Bond. :lol:

Plastic surgery wouldn't be much of a help.Cragginess like his doesn't just go away overnight :twisted:
User avatar
stockslivevan
SPECTRE 02
Posts: 3249
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:13 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia with Love
Location: Crab Key

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by stockslivevan »

bjmdds wrote:Star Trek is poorly cast as a "Prequel" yet CR was properly cast as a "Prequel"? Are you kidding?
Vulcans do not kid, BJ.

Image


This new Star Trek movie looks like CW material. This is the worst thing to happen to a franchise since Roger Moore to James Bond.
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14814
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Your theory of poor casting will be blown out of the water this weekend Stocks. It is a properly done reboot and the director J. J. got it right vs. Campbell and Broccoli's lame attempt at their so-called 8 minute bathroom prequel segment. By the way, CRAIG was the worst thing to ever happen to the Bond franchise. Do you think he could be tolerated for 7 films over 12 years? :shock:
Image
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3389
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by The Sweeney »

bjmdds wrote:Your theory of poor casting will be blown out of the water this weekend Stocks. It is a properly done reboot and the director J. J. got it right vs. Campbell and Broccoli's lame attempt at their so-called 8 minute bathroom prequel segment. By the way, CRAIG was the worst thing to ever happen to the Bond franchise.
Judging by the overwhelming critical and commercial success of CR, and the subsequent knock-on effect with the opening weekends worldwide of QoS, I'd say Campbell and Broccoli got it spot on with everything to do with CR, including the casting. Facts, BJ, just the facts. Spin it any way you want to, but CR was a success.

QoS however is a different matter entirely.....
User avatar
stockslivevan
SPECTRE 02
Posts: 3249
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:13 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia with Love
Location: Crab Key

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by stockslivevan »

bjmdds wrote:Your theory of poor casting will be blown out of the water this weekend Stocks.
Kind of like how yours was about CR huh? Oh of course, that has to be an exception for you. Frankly, I don't care. This new movie is made for the masses so of course it'll make money.
It is a properly done reboot and the director J. J. got it right
So you think Star Trek should have always been like that? Christ. As a lontime Trek fan, I'll tell ya, this is the wrong direction for Star Trek.
By the way, Moore was the worst thing to ever happen to the Bond franchise.
You're catching on BJ. ;)
Do you think he could be tolerated for 7 films over 12 years? :shock:
I don't think I could tolerate ANY actor for that long :lol:. Five films for me is the limit.
User avatar
John Drake
Commander
Posts: 340
Joined: Tue Jun 19, 2007 10:22 pm
Location: Watching the first twenty James Bond films somewhere...

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by John Drake »

stockslivevan wrote:Someone mention Trek?

Frankly it's poorly cast. An underwear model as CAPTAIN JAMES T KIRK? Right. Kirk is supposed to be a man, not surprised you guys approve given how some here think Cavill is ideal as Bond. :lol:


Kirk
Image

I haven't seen the new film so have no idea if it is generic or not but you could say they cast the young Shatner in the sixties because he was a pretty-boy. They didn't give him the part for his acting surely.
"He is very good-looking" Vesper Lynd
User avatar
stockslivevan
SPECTRE 02
Posts: 3249
Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 12:13 am
Favorite Bond Movie: From Russia with Love
Location: Crab Key

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by stockslivevan »

You're calling Shatner a pretty boy?


Image

Shatner is NOT amused.
User avatar
carl stromberg
Ministry of Defence
Ministry of Defence
Posts: 4489
Joined: Sun Feb 11, 2007 7:15 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: The Spy Who Loved Me
Favorite Movies: Amicus compendium horror films
It's a Gift
A Night At The Opera
The Return of the Pink Panther
Sons of the Desert
Location: The Duck Inn

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by carl stromberg »

The young Kirk casting makes sense as he is supposed to be a younger version of the mid-60's William Shatner. I thought we were going to get a "young Sean Connery" for Casino Royale. It can easily be argued that Bond got his 00 licence in his mid-20's and would have been handsome; Fleming said he was still handsome when he had aged a bit and some of his tough adventures and unhealthy lifestyle choices had taken their toll, so he was probably a "pretty boy" when he was younger. Instead we had some 40 year old short odd-looking chap who looks 50 (and about 20 years older than Connery and Lazenby in their first Bond films) as a young Bond (although as The Sweeney said, the public liked it). The Star Trek young Kirk should be more convincing. Or maybe he will be awful as I have yet to see the film!
Bring back Bond!
katied

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by katied »

Craig was young looking. But all of a sudden he aged.Overnight. It's a little scary,a LOT Dorian Grey :P
Post Reply