stockslivevan wrote:Just saw the commercial...bjmdds wrote:I just TRIED to watch CR on the Showtime cable channel. I had to shut it off half way through the film. Craig is INTOLERABLE as Bond to me, and I find the entire film a bore with him in the lead. With Henry Cavill's new commercial, how much longer before he replaces CraigI'm sorry BJ, but that kid isn't man enough to play a good convincing Bond. Maybe in a decade when he loses that babyface and stops being a metrosexual, MAYBE he'll be right for Bond. But no. No. No. No. No. No... NO. If Craig were to leave soon, I'd rather have Sam Worthington in the role, and I have yet to see a clip of that guy! And he looks much more like a man who can handle himself unlike Cavill who looks like he would cry the instant someone messes his hair out of place.
It's no surprise that he does look 20 years younger than Craig, cuz, you know, he is 15 years younger. So given how young Cavill is, he's most likely to become the 8th actor rather than the 7th. WAY WAY WAY too young for Bond.how ridiculous will that be having the 7th Bond look 20 years younger than the 6th?
That BJ is mad wanting some tall, dashing, handsome actor as James Bond.
My issues with Cavill isn't that he's a "tall, dashing, handsome actor" like what your post tries to make it seem, it's that he's way too young and he looks like another bland Brosnan metrosexual instead of cool and manly like Connery, Moore, Dalton and Craig. Even Katied of all people agrees. 
Even the male model Lazenby looks more like a man than Cavill, but maybe that's an unfair comparison since he was 30 years old in the role. Cavill doesn't seem different than the rest of his generation who are mostly metrosexuals tools showing more concern with their looks than women do. As I said, maybe in a few years when he grows up and gets out of that phase he'll be suitable for Bond. But for now, he's seems no different than Abercrombie & Fitch.
)
