IF NICHOLAS CAGE REPLACED INDIANA JONES IN NEXT YEAR'S 4TH FILM OF THE SAGA, WOULD YOU BE PLEASED AND GO SEE IT? I WOULD NOT. I AM GLAD YOU ENJOYED CRAIG AS BOND, BUT REALIZE,OTHERS HERE MIGHT TAKE EXCEPTION TO IT.markowen4lyf wrote:CANT YOU ALL JUST GROW UP AND ACCEPT THAT DANIEL CRAIG IS BOND. HE DID A BLOODY GOOD JOB AT CASINO ROYALE AND YOU ARE ALL SAD TO SET UP A WEBSITE - JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT AGREE WITH THE CASTING! HE MAY BE BLOND OR YOU MIGHT NOT LIKE HOW HE LOOKS BUT JEEZ HOW SUPERFICIAL ARE YOU?
Jermaine76 wrote: See, anti-Craiggers are on point. We have lots and detailed infomation as for why Gollum, I mean Craig is not Bond.
markowen4lyf wrote:CANT YOU ALL JUST GROW UP AND ACCEPT THAT DANIEL CRAIG IS BOND. HE DID A BLOODY GOOD JOB AT CASINO ROYALE AND YOU ARE ALL SAD TO SET UP A WEBSITE - JUST BECAUSE YOU DONT AGREE WITH THE CASTING! HE MAY BE BLOND OR YOU MIGHT NOT LIKE HOW HE LOOKS BUT JEEZ HOW SUPERFICIAL ARE YOU?
markowen4lyf wrote: and i take exception to the left her there remark - i'm sure my family would miss me.

markowen4lyf wrote: i dont think that some of the reasons people give to why they dont like daniel craig are right. just cos he doesnt look like your traditional bond doesnt make him worse. I thought he was really good in casino royale.
Skywalker wrote:The style of the film and Craig's uncouth approach made it difficult for me to regard his performance as Bond like. His portrayal at times verged on the Rambo scale, when all that was needed was a traditional Bond one.
Captain Nash wrote:Skywalker wrote:The style of the film and Craig's uncouth approach made it difficult for me to regard his performance as Bond like. His portrayal at times verged on the Rambo scale, when all that was needed was a traditional Bond one.
Rambo.Come on, it never looked like Rambo. And I know that many dislike Craig but he's only giving his interpratation of Bond as the script says.
But for me, 'it's a new world, with new enemies and new threats, but you can still depend on one man...OO7!'
It worked for me back in '95, and it could be said again in '06 and work again.
Captain Nash wrote:Aren't we missing something Skywalker?
Captain Nash wrote: I thought you'd like it.
I'm guessing you don't agree?
Captain Nash wrote:I know that many dislike Craig but he's only giving his interpratation of Bond as the script says.
Captain Nash wrote:But for me, 'it's a new world, with new enemies and new threats.
Captain Nash wrote:[And I know that many dislike Craig but he's only giving his interpratation of Bond as the script says.

markowen4lyf wrote:im editing what i put - i was alittle too strong.
i dont think that some of the reasons people give to why they dont like daniel craig are right. just cos he doesnt look like your traditional bond doesnt make him worse. I thought he was really good in casino royale.

Harvey Wallbanger wrote:
I like DC but not in CR. -CR was a horrible movie for gobs of reasons.
DC can be Bond -which is my main prob with DC in CR.
I'm more worried about the producers screwing up DC. JB is an art and DC was painting with a blank canvas -and they didn't give him any colors to work with -causing his bond to be bland and unimagnitave. A action clone if you will.
I think you'll find most people here don't care about DC's hair color.
Skywalker wrote:Some people obviously have issues with his appearance and it is understandable. I can personally look beyond that, but the problem starts for me when his performance is so far removed from what Bond 'should' be. If you dislike his appearance and performance then you are unlikely to enjoy any of his films.
Return to Daniel Craig as James Bond
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests