he could easily play bondVeronica wrote:tbp82 wrote:Veronica wrote:Cavill is certainly one of the most obvious candidates to take over the role. I would still like for Tom Ellis to get on the run as well.
While Ellis isnt at the top of my wishlist hes a solid candidate to me. He looks the part, is pretty unknown not a bad choice at all. I think Lucifer got cancelled so be interesting to see what he does next.
Lucifer is back on now but honestly while the main character was terribly fun in the fist two seasons and Ellis couldn't have been any more perfect for the role season 3 was just a big nothing with corny plot points and bad acting from an already terribly bland main actress. Ellis deserves better.
007 wrote:Matthew Goode was tested for Casino Royale if I remember. I think he might have jinxed his chances a few years ago when he said he didn't like the modern Bond films much.
Veronica wrote:007 wrote:Matthew Goode was tested for Casino Royale if I remember. I think he might have jinxed his chances a few years ago when he said he didn't like the modern Bond films much.
I can not believe that between Goode and Cavill(even though he was really young at the time) they chose Craig. I mean, that is downright mind boggling.
tbp82 wrote:Veronica wrote:007 wrote:Matthew Goode was tested for Casino Royale if I remember. I think he might have jinxed his chances a few years ago when he said he didn't like the modern Bond films much.
I can not believe that between Goode and Cavill(even though he was really young at the time) they chose Craig. I mean, that is downright mind boggling.
Other names in the frame at that time appeared to be Sam Worthington (Avatar), Goran Vinjsc (ER), Rupert Friend (Homeland), Alex O'Loughlin (Hawaii 5-0), and Julian Mcmahon (Nip/Tuck) and based on looks Craig was the least Bondish of them all.
When he dropped out of Superman, I did entertain the hope that he'd received a better offer. But the latest press release from EON does seem to indicate that we're stuck with Craig for at least one more film.John Drake wrote:Cavill as Bond is starting to make a lot of sense at the moment. He's the right age, popular, good in interviews.
Kristatos wrote:When he dropped out of Superman, I did entertain the hope that he'd received a better offer. But the latest press release from EON does seem to indicate that we're stuck with Craig for at least one more film.John Drake wrote:Cavill as Bond is starting to make a lot of sense at the moment. He's the right age, popular, good in interviews.
Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk
Henry Cavill is reportedly being eyed to be the next James Bond. In 2011, Cavill snagged the highly coveted role of Warner Bros. new Superman, but his superhero career hasn't gone according to plan. After just three appearances, there's been reports that Cavill is ready to leave the role behind. This comes on the heels of him being cast in the lead of Netflix's The Witcher live-action series. While he may have a small screen franchise locked down, another one on the big screen may be headed his way. One of the most talked about potential next roles for Cavill has been James Bond. Daniel Craig currently plays the role for MGM and Eon, but Bond 25 is scheduled to be his final outing. The studios will need someone to replace him eventually, and a new rumor suggests they already have their eyes set on Cavill. Gossip site Crazy Days and Nights shared a blind item rumor last week that a studio was looking to cast a "foreign born former superhero" as a replacement in a long-running franchise. Today, the site revealed what that mystery rumor was about, and it was indeed in regard to Cavill being eyed to be the next Bond.
John P. Drake wrote:He doesn't have that "killer" face, in my opinion. And besides, he's already too old.
Veronica wrote:John P. Drake wrote:He doesn't have that "killer" face, in my opinion. And besides, he's already too old.
I agree he might be too old to start as Bond but...what would exactly define a killer face?
John P. Drake wrote:Veronica wrote:John P. Drake wrote:He doesn't have that "killer" face, in my opinion. And besides, he's already too old.
I agree he might be too old to start as Bond but...what would exactly define a killer face?
As in he'd look very convincing that he could kill a man. Not psychotic or sociopathic, per se. Just dangerous. Gruffudd doesn't have it, I'm afraid.
Veronica wrote:John P. Drake wrote:Veronica wrote:John P. Drake wrote:He doesn't have that "killer" face, in my opinion. And besides, he's already too old.
I agree he might be too old to start as Bond but...what would exactly define a killer face?
As in he'd look very convincing that he could kill a man. Not psychotic or sociopathic, per se. Just dangerous. Gruffudd doesn't have it, I'm afraid.
I don't know, in "Liar" he played cold and calculating to perfection..
Is Craig still even on to play Bond again? Wasn't there some talk he might back out due to becoming a father?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests