The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

General Bond discussion from Sean Connery to Pierce Brosnan
Post Reply
User avatar
Omega
0010
Posts: 7310
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2007 9:01 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: TLD LTK GE TND TWINE DAD OHMSS
Favorite Movies: Gladiator
John Wick
Pacific Rim
LOTR trilogy
RED
Kingsman
X-Men First Class
X-Men Days of Futures Past
MI Rogue Nation
Location: the lost city
Contact:

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Omega »

Great the opening can be young bond being abused


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
............ :007:
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14346
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

That's exactly where this film is heading big O :!:
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3388
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by The Sweeney »

I must admit, I'm a bit baffled with this direction of SPECTRE. Why do we have to revisit Bond's childhood again? It was rather dull in SF, and makes no sense why they are pushing further down this route.

It has nothing to do with Fleming, just an interpretation of something Fleming wrote as a throwaway line.

They still have many unused scenes and stories from the Fleming novels. Give me another writer like Maibaum any day of the week, someone who understood the novels, and tapped into them and borrowed them whenever he could, whether it was scenes, moments or characters. He was particularly good at this from FYEO right the way through to LTK.

Couldn't we hear that SPECTRE was using some previously unused Fleming material, instead of this childhood crap...?
Last edited by The Sweeney on Thu Mar 05, 2015 1:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 12555
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

bjmdds wrote:That's exactly where this film is heading big O :!:
I really don't think they'll go there. Certainly nothing in the leaked documents suggests it. It'll be another "we used to be like brothers, now we're enemies" plot.
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
User avatar
The Saint 007
0013
Posts: 3716
Joined: Thu Aug 02, 2012 11:16 am
Favorite Bond Movie: The Spy Who Loved Me, A View To A Kill, Goldfinger, GoldenEye, For Your Eyes Only, Moonraker, Octopussy, Thunderball

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by The Saint 007 »

The Sweeney wrote:I mist admit, I'm a bit baffled with this direction of SPECTRE. Why do we have to revisit Bond's childhood again? It was rather dull in SF, and makes no sense why they are pushing further down this route.

It has nothing to do with Fleming, just an interpretation of something Fleming wrote as a throwaway line.

They still have many unused scenes and stories from the Fleming novels. Give me another writer like Maibaum any day of the week, someone who understood the novels, and tapped into them and borrowed them whenever he could, whether it was scenes, moments or characters. He was particularly good at this from FYEO right the way through to LTK.

Couldn't we hear that SPECTRE was using some previously unused Fleming material, instead of this childhood crap...?
The psychology of Bond seems to be the primary focus of the Craig era, and I don't think he's ever going to get a standard mission/adventure Bond film. We'll probably have to wait for the next actor to get that again. I suppose the filmmakers concoct all sorts of crap about Bond's personal life because it's arguably easier for them to do, and they really don't know where to go with the series. I totally agree with you in regards to Richard Maibaum, he's the best writer for the series, in my opinion.
Image
User avatar
Count_Lippe
Agent
Posts: 755
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 2:15 am

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Count_Lippe »

Maibaum (and a few co-writers) also made the Fleming stories the early films were based on actually much better than the novels, they worked much better as motion pictures.

But like The Sweeney says there are still some Fleming material that could be used for future films.
Image
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3388
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by The Sweeney »

Kristatos wrote:
bjmdds wrote:That's exactly where this film is heading big O :!:
I really don't think they'll go there. Certainly nothing in the leaked documents suggests it. It'll be another "we used to be like brothers, now we're enemies" plot.
Yaaaawwn! I really hope not. :roll:

That concept is getting very worn and tired now. It was first introduced in GE, then we have had various takes on it ever since (friend turned foe), most recently with Silva in SF.

Can't we just have a traditional storyline for once. You know, Gunbarrel opening, decent PTS, then Bond gets briefed by M, pops down to see Q and get a gadget or two (yes, I'm all for this at the moment), goes off on a jaunt, meets the villain, escapes a near death or two, battles with the villain and henchman on the way, villain's plot is foiled, then the villain launches a last minute surprise attack at Bond in the final scene, before Bond beds the girl and the credits roll.

And along the way, steal a few unused scenes from Fleming, but actual proper scenes, not a post-Cubby EON interpretation which ends up nothing remotely like the source material.

This is not rocket science.....
User avatar
Count_Lippe
Agent
Posts: 755
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 2:15 am

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Count_Lippe »

The Bond character in the novels was a very brooding person but I don't think this comes across in the DC films, instead there are a lot of other psychological stuff that don't have much to do with Bond.

They could even have made the new films with a voice over where Bond talked about his inner thoughts, and this would have been much more true to Fleming's Bond.
Image
User avatar
Kristatos
OO Moderator
OO Moderator
Posts: 12555
Joined: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm
Location: St. Cyril's

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Kristatos »

The Sweeney wrote:
Can't we just have a traditional storyline for once. You know, Gunbarrel opening, decent PTS, then Bond gets briefed by M, pops down to see Q and get a gadget or two (yes, I'm all for this at the moment), goes off on a jaunt, meets the villain, escapes a near death or two, battles with the villain and henchman on the way, villain's plot is foiled, then the villain launches a last minute surprise attack at Bond in the final scene, before Bond beds the girl and the credits roll.

And along the way, steal a few unused scenes from Fleming, but actual proper scenes, not a post-Cubby EON interpretation which ends up nothing remotely like the source material.

This is not rocket science.....
It's called Kingsman (or so I hear - still haven't seen it yet).
"He's the one that doesn't smile" - Queen Elizabeth II on Daniel Craig
User avatar
The Sweeney
003
Posts: 3388
Joined: Mon Feb 12, 2007 2:21 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: OHMSS, GF, LTK, CR, FRWL
Favorite Movies: Bullitt, The Long Good Friday, The Towering Inferno, Jaws, Rocky, Superman the Movie, McVicar, Goodfellas, Get Carter, Three Days of the Condor, Butch & Sundance, The Sting, All the Presidents Men
Location: Underneath a Mango Tree....

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by The Sweeney »

Count_Lippe wrote:The Bond character in the novels was a very brooding person but I don't think this comes across in the DC films, instead there are a lot of other psychological stuff that don't have much to do with Bond.

They could even have made the new films with a voice over where Bond talked about his inner thoughts, and this would have been much more true to Fleming's Bond.
I suppose Craig's had his share of brooding moments in his films (the drunken bar flight scene in QoS, ripping his bloody shirt off in the bathroom before pouring a bourbon in CR, drinking on a beach hut in SF with some woman), but there needs to be more of this, and also how about seeing Bond enjoy a slap-up meal for once, or bring some of his sophistication back, being a connoisseur of fine wines, etc. We always read about the exotic meals Bond would eat in the novels, how about now seeing some on screen.
User avatar
Captain Arthurs
Lieutenant
Posts: 48
Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 2:35 pm
Location: England and Switzerland

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Captain Arthurs »

The Sweeney wrote:
Count_Lippe wrote:, and also how about seeing Bond enjoy a slap-up meal for once, or bring some of his sophistication back, being a connoisseur of fine wines, etc. We always read about the exotic meals Bond would eat in the novels, how about now seeing some on screen.
Daniel Craig looked awful eating dinner in Casino Royale with his mouth open. So food is a no go area for Craig's Bond along with dyed black hair. :lol:
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14346
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Kristatos wrote:
bjmdds wrote:That's exactly where this film is heading big O :!:
I really don't think they'll go there. Certainly nothing in the leaked documents suggests it. It'll be another "we used to be like brothers, now we're enemies" plot.
Just wait and see Kris. We were already set up with the bisexual connotation of Bond in SK-awful and now Mendes will further push this psychological Bond profile to the extreme.
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14346
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

The Sweeney wrote:
Kristatos wrote:
bjmdds wrote:That's exactly where this film is heading big O :!:
I really don't think they'll go there. Certainly nothing in the leaked documents suggests it. It'll be another "we used to be like brothers, now we're enemies" plot.
Yaaaawwn! I really hope not. :roll:

That concept is getting very worn and tired now. It was first introduced in GE, then we have had various takes on it ever since (friend turned foe), most recently with Silva in SF.

Can't we just have a traditional storyline for once. You know, Gunbarrel opening, decent PTS, then Bond gets briefed by M, pops down to see Q and get a gadget or two (yes, I'm all for this at the moment), goes off on a jaunt, meets the villain, escapes a near death or two, battles with the villain and henchman on the way, villain's plot is foiled, then the villain launches a last minute surprise attack at Bond in the final scene, before Bond beds the girl and the credits roll.

And along the way, steal a few unused scenes from Fleming, but actual proper scenes, not a post-Cubby EON interpretation which ends up nothing remotely like the source material.

This is not rocket science.....
Cr-egg's Bond is NOT fun, plain and simple. He is a tormented individual, who eats and looks like a slob, and who hates being who he is. MOROSE defines Cr-egg's Bond.
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14346
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Image 12th snow here in past 8 weeks :!: .........A Delta flight carrying 130 passengers and crew skidded off a snow-covered runway at New York's LaGuardia Airport, slamming through a fence on the side of the tarmac. Passengers were being evacuated and there were no immediate reports of injuries.
User avatar
Count_Lippe
Agent
Posts: 755
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 2:15 am

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Count_Lippe »

Captain Arthurs you messed up your post, I didn't write what you quoted. :lol:

Anyway, Bond has ordered Beluga caviar and Dom Perignon champagne before in the films, so we know he's a connoisseur.
Image
User avatar
Daltonite Toothpaste
Single O
Posts: 883
Joined: Tue May 22, 2012 2:35 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: The Living Daylights, Licence To Kill, On Her Majesty's Secret Service, From Russia With Love, Tomorrow Never Dies & For Your Eyes Only.
Favorite Movies: American Mary, Deadlier Than The Male, Dracula, Saved, The Big Sleep, The French Connection, Under The Sand

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Daltonite Toothpaste »

bjmdds wrote:Mendes is ruining the franchise with his psychotic obsessions of first Mommie Dearest in SK-Awful and now his revealed plot with Bond's childhood emotional development with a damaged friend, who grows up to attempt to take over the world at Bond's expense :!: :roll: ............"James Bond director Sam Mendes has released information about the upcoming 007 film, saying "Spectre" will answer questions concerning Bond's childhood. The 24th James Bond movie "Spectre" is due out in theaters on Nov. 6, and director Sam Mendes revealed the plot will revolve around the spymaster's childhood and why Bond came to be an orphan. When Sony Pictures first released the "Spectre" behind-the-scenes featurette last month, audiences were treated to action footage shot on snowy mountains, unaware of the film revolving around the the all-important story of the British spy's past, a theme the last 22 Bond films never visited until "Skyfall" in 2012. "Skyfall" hinted at what was supposedly a tragic childhood Bond experienced in his native Scotland after both his parents died. Mendes has hinted "Spectre" will focus on Bond seeking the truth behind his parents' demise. "Spectre," which will be Daniel Craig's fourth 007 film, is also rumored to be his last." (let's hope so) :!: :cheers:

You must hand it to EON, they are determined to rob the character of any mystery (his past). The more this sorry snore fest continues, the more I want to take back every bad word that I have ever spoken or written about the Brosnan era.
Image
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14346
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

You said it DT. You will become an avid Brosnan fan. If this trash grosses anywhere near $1 billion we may as well give up on society, and realize that, as FBF always says, anything goes as Bond these days, and we can remain the loyal oppostion here to Eon's fringe ways with the franchise, ala Dumbledore's army was to Voldemort in HP.
Atticus
Lieutenant
Posts: 178
Joined: Thu Dec 04, 2014 3:56 pm

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Atticus »

Omega wrote: Great the opening can be young bond being abused

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
That would be obviously extreme, and I'd like to think Eon still has enough taste not to go down that path. Then again, they did throw in a rape scene near the end of QOS where the idiotic Latin American general, Menendez or Medrano or whatever the hell he is called, attacks a young woman while explosions were going on, a useless scene that doesn't advance his character in any way because we were already told he's an evil guy. I do agree with bjmdds that we haven't heard the last of the gay reference that Craig's Bond revealed in Shitefall. In the Mendes film American Beauty, there's an emo kid with some kind of psycho-sexual issue (oh gawd, will they suggest Bond was an emo type of kid?), as well as a marine colonel who snaps into a homicidal rage because he was a repressed homosexual. So it wouldn't surprise me if Mendes brought these types of character elements into the story, if not in Craig's Bond, then in another character like Tanner or this childhood friend Oberhauser. Who knows, maybe Ralph Fiennes' M is gay too, or maybe they'll bring back the 100-year old groundskeeper Kincaid to show us he's gay too? This is the type of characterization that seems to fascinate Eon and Mendes. We'll see.
User avatar
Count_Lippe
Agent
Posts: 755
Joined: Fri May 04, 2007 2:15 am

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by Count_Lippe »

Here's an example of "voice over" I mentioned, Robert Mitchum in the Raymond Chandler movie Farewell My Lovely (1975), after the title theme.

Could you imagine a Bond film like this?

[video][/video]
Image
User avatar
bjmdds
001
Posts: 14346
Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2007 10:14 pm
Favorite Bond Movie: Any without CR-egg in it.

Re: The BJMDDS General Discussion Thread......

Post by bjmdds »

Harrison Ford’s plane crashes into Los Angeles golf course: Image The 72-year-old actor was reportedly flying over the Penmar Golf Course in Venice Thursday when his yellow, vintage aircraft crash landed into the green. TMZ reported that he suffered multiple gashes to his head and was bleeding.
Post Reply