Yes, they finished production a few months ago. This is the exclusive first still of Daniel Craig as Hitler. He plays a young rookie Hitler new to the German secret service.Capt. Sir Dominic Flandry wrote:Is Daniel Craig playing Hitler in a film? He has the same haircut!007 wrote:The least attractive Bond (as proven by science) was in Rome at the weekend to watch England play rugby.
He always was called Dorian Grey for a reason.007 wrote:Amazed how young Tom Cruise looks. He must have a painting in the attic somewhere.Omega wrote:good trailer , look better than the last 12 years of bond although it followed the same fighting style on camera more or less but it looks like it was a story behind it rather than feeling obligated to include a chase then copy something that happened in a classic bond moviebjmdds wrote:[video][/video] Sean Harris's villainous Solomon Lane – leader of 'The Syndicate' – will escape from his box to cause more mischief. "Ethan Hunt and his IMF team, along with some familiar allies, race against time after a mission gone wrong." McQuarrie gave us a (tiny) bit more information when he clarified the newly-announced title in January. "The title has multiple meanings in the film, from the literal to the figurative," he told Empire. "There is the threat of nuclear terrorism hanging over the movie, which is the literal threat. There's the notion that what's happened in the movie is the end result of choices that Ethan Hunt has made in his life. It's Ethan's past come back to haunt him. It's the fallout of all his good intentions."
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
oh noes!Kristatos wrote:Oh ffs: https://movieweb.com/last-jedi-secret-g ... -reaction/
Kristatos wrote:Oh ffs: https://movieweb.com/last-jedi-secret-g ... -reaction/
Are we? To me, the saddest thing is that anybody actually noticed. Who the hell checks out background shots of snuggling porgs to see if their colouring identifies them as male? The gay porg police?dirtybenny wrote:
I don't know what's sadder, the fact they took the time to include a background shot of some gay CGI hamsters, or that we are supposed to applaud the fact they did it as some sort of watershed moment!
This is a whole new level of ridiculous.dirtybenny wrote:Kristatos wrote:Oh ffs: https://movieweb.com/last-jedi-secret-g ... -reaction/
I don't know what's sadder, the fact they took the time to include a background shot of some gay CGI hamsters, or that we are supposed to applaud the fact they did it as some sort of watershed moment!
Yes Kris, that is indeed very sad, and we are meant to be impressed with this Easter egg, at least according to the author of the article as evidenced by it's very existence and the fact these two are described as "characters" though we get but a fleeting glimpse of them, couple that with the twitter comments raving how "brave" it was to have included this.Kristatos wrote:Are we? To me, the saddest thing is that anybody actually noticed. Who the hell checks out background shots of snuggling porgs to see if their colouring identifies them as male? The gay porg police?dirtybenny wrote:
I don't know what's sadder, the fact they took the time to include a background shot of some gay CGI hamsters, or that we are supposed to applaud the fact they did it as some sort of watershed moment!
If your going to be "brave" and push the envelope, then do it, I mean come right out (no pun intended) and have a gay character not 10 seconds of hamster kissing in the background, there is nothing sadder than timid activism! Probably the cgi team that did this leaked the story to get attention. Maybe some obsessed fan watching the movie in IMAX for the 100th time but I just don’t see anyone really caring enough about this more than the cgi team virtue signaling.Kristatos wrote:Are we? To me, the saddest thing is that anybody actually noticed. Who the hell checks out background shots of snuggling porgs to see if their colouring identifies them as male? The gay porg police?dirtybenny wrote:
I don't know what's sadder, the fact they took the time to include a background shot of some gay CGI hamsters, or that we are supposed to applaud the fact they did it as some sort of watershed moment!
I think you underestimate how scarily obsessive some fans can be.Omega wrote: Probably the cgi team that did this leaked the story to get attention. Maybe some obsessed fan watching the movie in IMAX for the 100th time but I just don’t see anyone really caring enough about this more than the cgi team virtue signaling.
ah, true. I still don’t see how this is a big dealKristatos wrote:I think you underestimate how scarily obsessive some fans can be.Omega wrote: Probably the cgi team that did this leaked the story to get attention. Maybe some obsessed fan watching the movie in IMAX for the 100th time but I just don’t see anyone really caring enough about this more than the cgi team virtue signaling.
Well, it isn't. The fact that anyone would actually take the trouble to scrutinise porg plumage to try and identify gay porgs says more about them than it does about the film.Omega wrote:ah, true. I still don’t see how this is a big dealKristatos wrote:I think you underestimate how scarily obsessive some fans can be.Omega wrote: Probably the cgi team that did this leaked the story to get attention. Maybe some obsessed fan watching the movie in IMAX for the 100th time but I just don’t see anyone really caring enough about this more than the cgi team virtue signaling.
Who would even notice this stupidity? Society is sick, and getting sicker 
-----------In an interview last year, Oscar Issac addressed the impact of actual LGBT representation and said that he’s open to playing a gay character, but there won’t be one in Star Wars yet. Issac, who plays Poe Dameron, said: “Well what it means to me is that people can see themselves in a hero like this, in a movie like this, which I love. “Not only LGBT [fans] but Latinos… there’s a representation out there for that.” John Boyega, who plays Finn, said that the issue of LGBT representation should be addressed on-screen.---------I am now done with this franchise It seems this topic is all the younger Hollywood skulls of mush can focus on They will never get it [video][/video]Omega wrote:Probably the cgi team that did this leaked the story to get attention. Maybe some obsessed fan watching the movie in IMAX for the 100th time but I just don’t see anyone really caring enough about this more than the cgi team virtue signaling.Kristatos wrote:Are we? To me, the saddest thing is that anybody actually noticed. Who the hell checks out background shots of snuggling porgs to see if their colouring identifies them as male? The gay porg police?dirtybenny wrote:
I don't know what's sadder, the fact they took the time to include a background shot of some gay CGI hamsters, or that we are supposed to applaud the fact they did it as some sort of watershed moment!
What ought to bother people more in the milking scene.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
