Classic Bond Forum

So after all the this and that will happen in Bond 22. The old crystal ball has been dusted off I see. :lol: A question that often get's no answer, (I wonder why?) What happens to this site when Daniel Craig departs the role and is officially not Bond anymore?...even though he always will be..from ...

The only thing worse than being talked about is not being talked about - Oscar Wilde

Terry wrote:Sony's multi-million dollar brainwashing campaign must have failed to reach Canada.

Daniel Craig is not that ugly in general everyday life but he's very ugly for a James Bond. That's the difference. James Bond is supposed to be a handsome devil. That's part of the character. It's lost with Craig. Who wants to be Craig's Bond? It used to be part of the character. Hopefully it will ...

It weighs a ton too. Big book.

There used to be an interview with Michael G Wilson on the 007Forever site from around 1999 where he dismisses Casino Royale, saying there isn't enough to turn into a film. The question is, who would have made a cooler James Bond film, Campbell or Quentin Tarantino? The answer to that is obvious. :...

I understand what people mean about Craig in future Bond books and Bond DVDs. The recent Art of 007 book is one I would have almost certainly bought in the past. I flicked through it in the bookshop and Craig was so much the odd man out in the photos it was almost comical.

Daniel Craig is not that ugly in general everyday life but he's very ugly for a James Bond. That's the difference. James Bond is supposed to be a handsome devil. That's part of the character. It's lost with Craig. Who wants to be Craig's Bond?

There used to be an interview with Michael G Wilson on the 007Forever site from around 1999 where he dismisses Casino Royale, saying there isn't enough to turn into a film. The question is, who would have made a cooler James Bond film, Campbell or Quentin Tarantino? The answer to that is obvious. :w...

A compotent actor but he doesn't have the looks for Bond.

To say how unattractive or craggy faced or unBondian he looks wont change a d**n thing. So why bother. It's called having a view. True.........but unfortunately for you guys, it means nowt at the end of the day. You never know in the future you may even begin to like the new style of Bond films wit...

That suave superspy thing has been done to death now. I'd go even further and make 007 a homeless alcoholic working part-time in a soup kitchen.

I liked Bond because he had his own niche in the action/adventure genre. A lot of heroes are blue-collar everyman oiks. Bond was a charming contrast. I suppose that explains why I can't stand our current plumber 'Bond'. I also love the way each film is more or less the same but dressed up in the la...

This is a very eccentric thread given the name of this forum.

I prefer Timothy Dalton.

I think Craig will do three and then jump overboard.

I have nothing agaisnt Daniel Craig but I didn't really think of him as James Bond in Casino Royale.

Kristatos wrote:

John Drake wrote:Nice to see Danger Man hasn't been forgotten.

Actually, I only ever saw a couple of episodes of Danger Man, but I've seen every episode of The Prisoner.

Me too. The last ever episode really cleared things up didn't it?

Still one of my favourite shows ever.

Nice to see Danger Man hasn't been forgotten.

You don't have a thread for this but I thought I would say I'm new to the forum.