Classic Bond Forum

I'm sure that I can contain my excitement until Poundland get copies in stock.

it's a forgone conclusion. Hell, he didn't even approve of Connery.

The last that I heard, was that the lawsuit was dropped, and that the film could go ahead. but it's been months since I heard that.

By your 8000th post Cr-egg will be on his 10th Bond film at age 65 and I think it will take 1 million views of this thread until Cr-egg is vanquished from the role as well. :lol: Good news for you BJMDDS - Goldeneye said the first person to 10000 posts on the forum gets a free Daniel Craig tattoo. ...

bjmdds wrote:This should kill off Cavill's career as Superman which would make him available for Bond whenever Broccoli wakes up.

And by the opposite token, I hope that WB keeps pumping out those films, just to keep Cavill away from Bond. Especially since U.N.C.L.E. tanked making a sequel unlikely.

I humbly accept my loss :) Congratulations EA! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Yeah, Thanks. Infact, i got my maths wrong recently, as at the time i didn't realize i had won, not that it means anything anyways...........as i seem to remember, our member here, i think it was 'The Captain....' sai...

I humbly accept my loss :) Congratulations EA! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Yeah, Thanks. Infact, i got my maths wrong recently, as at the time i didn't realize i had won, not that it means anything anyways...........as i seem to remember, our member here, i think it was 'The Captain....' sai...

When EON start making Bond films again, it would be a welcome treat if they put Bond back in an Aston.

Not sure about Bond, but I could see Woodward as M. Or as Mallory in a Daltonised Skyfall (1992), replacing Brown as M.

I'm not a Star Wars fan, but that is some turn out. I don't envy having a film still showing in cinemas...

There's something really off about this: [video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRVD32rnzOw[/video] This......on the other hand..... [video]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LbduDRH2m2M[/video] Now this is something. This makes more sense to make than Thomas Crown 2. how many times can Kirk lose his ...

I didn't want the series rebooted the last time, and I don't want it to happen again, this time set in the past. Just reboot, and keep it in the modern day.

bjmdds wrote:UNCLE bombed at the box office but EON likes the director? What about both him and Cavill?

I'm not sure about Ritchie, and a definite 'no' to Cavill.

It screams "i'm trying too hard" to me.

Napoleon Solo wrote:Updated box office. $5.4 million for the weekend, No. 5.

In US-Canada, now at $184.5 million, No. 10 for the year so far. But Star Wars is coming, of course.

Global figure now $792 million.

That's me out ($750M).

Posted this in the Aiden Turner thread but feel its relevant here to. But, that might be a preview of how Aiden Turner would look as Bond. http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2015-12-03/life-after-poldark-what-aidan-turner-did-next Never seen him act, but I can see Bond in the photo. Check out Being Hum...

tbp82 wrote:Posted this in the Aiden Turner thread but feel its relevant here to. But, that might be a preview of how Aiden Turner would look as Bond.

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2015-12- ... r-did-next

Never seen him act, but I can see Bond in the photo.

Pam, most certainly.

Wait, did you just compare Dalton to Craig?



That's like comparing Bond to..... to Bourne. The Dalton films included the Bond formula, just in a different way. They didn't throw out 'the [s]baby[/s] Bond and the bathwater'.

The though of either of those being cast, doesn't fill me with excitement. Going by their screentests, Neill comes off as though he's trying to make Bond likeable, and Brolin a bit wooden. But to answer the thread title, I would rather see Sam Neil as an 80's Bond.